Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35014001›Full record

SynthesisCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2022

Morbidity and mortality in patients managed with high compared with low blood pressure targets during on-pump cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Charlotte C McEwen, Takhliq Amir, Yuan Qiu, Jack Young, Kevin Kennedy, Hilary P Grocott, Hessam Kashani, David Mazer, Scott Brudney, Morvarid Kavosh and 6 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  14. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte C McEwenDepartment of Surgery (Cardiac Surgery), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Takhliq AmirFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Yuan QiuFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jack YoungHealth Sciences Library, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kevin KennedyDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evaluation, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Hilary P GrocottDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Hessam KashaniDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
David MazerDepartment of Anesthesia, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Scott BrudneyDepartments of Medicine (Critical Care) and Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Morvarid KavoshDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Eric JacobsohnDepartments of Medicine (Critical Care) and Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Anne VedelDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eugene WangFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Richard P WhitlockDepartments of Surgery (Cardiac Surgery) and Health Research Methods, Evaluation, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Emilie P Belley-CotéPerioperative Research Division, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jessica SpencePerioperative Research Division, Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada. jessicaspence13@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1267-9455
McMaster University · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CACopenhagen University Hospital · DKImpact · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany believe that blood pressure management during cardiac surgery is associated with postoperative outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the impact of high compared with low intraoperative blood pressure targets on postoperative morbidity and mortality in adults undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Our primary objective was to inform the design of a future large RCT. SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and CENTRAL for RCTs comparing high with low intraoperative blood pressure targets in adult patients undergoing any cardiac surgical procedure on CPB. We screened reference lists, grey literature, and conference proceedings. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe included eight RCTs (N =1,116 participants); all examined the effect of blood pressure management only during the CPB. Trial definitions of high compared with low blood pressure varied and, in some, there was a discrepancy between the target and achieved mean arterial pressure. We observed no difference in delirium, cognitive decline, stroke, acute kidney injury, or mortality between high and low blood pressure targets (very-low to low quality evidence). Higher blood pressure targets may have increased the risk of requiring a blood transfusion (three trials; n = 456 participants; relative risk, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 1.9; P = 0.01; moderate quality evidence) but this finding was based on a small number of trials.

conclusionIndividual trial definitions of high and low blood pressure targets varied, limiting inferences. The effect of high (compared with low) blood pressure targets on other morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery remains unclear because of limitations with the body of existing evidence. Research to determine the optimal management of blood pressure during cardiac surgery is required. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020177376); registered: 5 July 2020.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresHypotensionAdultCardiopulmonary BypassHumansMorbidityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBlood pressure targetsCardiac surgeryCardiopulmonary bypassMorbidity and mortality

Identifiers

PMID35014001
OpenAlexW4205140545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.