ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2022
Skills assessment metrics of electric powered wheelchair driving in a virtual environment: a survey.
Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to present studies on the parameters for assessing the skills of users of electric wheelchair driving simulators in a virtual environment. In addition, this study also aims to identify the most widely used and validated parameters for the quantification of electric wheelchair driving ability in a virtual environment and to suggest challenges for future research. To carry out this research, the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were adopted. Literature searches in English, French, and Portuguese were conducted up to December 2020 in the PubMed, SciELO, Science Direct, World Wide Science, and Scopus databases. The keywords used were electric wheelchair, simulator, performance indicators, performance skills, driving skills, training platform, virtual environment, and virtual reality. We excluded studies involving "real" wheelchairs without a simulator in a virtual environment. We have selected a total of 42 items. In these studies, we identified 32 parameters (3 qualitative and 29 quantitative) that are used as parameters for the evaluation of the ability to control a powered wheelchair in a virtual environment. Although the amount of research in this area has increased significantly in recent years, additional studies are still needed to provide a more accurate and objective assessment of skills among the target population. A challenge for future work is the increasing application of artificial intelligence techniques and the exploration of biomedical data measurements, which may be a promising alternative to improve the quantification of user competencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.