Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013845›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2022

Low-level laser therapy is effective in controlling postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daiane Domingos de Barros, Josefa Simere Dos Santos Barros Catão, Alieny Cristina Duarte Ferreira, Thamyres Maria Silva Simões, Renata de Albuquerque Cavalcanti Almeida, Maria Helena Chaves de Vasconcelos Catão

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daiane Domingos de BarrosGraduate in Dentistry, State University of Paraiba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-789X
Josefa Simere Dos Santos Barros CatãoGraduate in Dentistry, Integrated Colleges of Patos (FIP), Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2382-9909
Alieny Cristina Duarte FerreiraPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, State University of Paraiba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0370-3177
Thamyres Maria Silva SimõesPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, State University of Paraiba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4642-5525
Renata de Albuquerque Cavalcanti AlmeidaSpecialist, Master and Doctor in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Traumatology Professor at the University of Pernambuco (UPE), Pernambuco, Brazil.
Maria Helena Chaves de Vasconcelos CatãoPostgraduate Program in Dentistry, State University of Paraiba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil. mhelenact@zipmail.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7681-3225
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba · BRUniversidade de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in controlling postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions. A search was carried out in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases, using the "low-level laser therapy", "photobiomodulation therapy", "impacted mandibular third molar", "mandibular third molar", "third molar extraction" descriptors and 2625 studies were found, including only randomized clinical trials published until July 2020, with no restrictions on language and country of study. Selected studies were submitted to initial screening based on the reading of titles, abstracts and full article, and duplicate studies were excluded. Overall, 2562 articles were found, of which only 15 randomized clinical trials were included in this review. A total of 648 patients (16-44 years) who received low-level laser therapy as an intervention and placebo in their control group were evaluated. The pain evaluation criterion was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on the second and seventh days after surgery. Photobiomodulation with low-level laser showed statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions, both on the second (MD: - 0.59; CI: - 0.92, - 0.27) and seventh day after surgery (MD: - 0.76; CI: - 1.21, - 0.32).

Indexed as

Low-Level Light TherapyTooth, ImpactedEdemaHumansMolar, ThirdPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTooth ExtractionTrismusImpacted mandibular third molarLow-level laser therapyMandibular third molarMolar thirdPhotobiomodulation therapyThird molar extraction

Identifiers

PMID35013845
OpenAlexW4206406593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.