ArticleJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2022
RNA-Seq for the detection of gene fusions in solid tumors: development and validation of the JAX FusionSeq™ 2.0 assay.
Article in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anchored random reverse primer sequencing for quantitative detection of novel gene fusions.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Characteristics of fusion genes in breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Clinical Implementation of Expanded Solid Tumor Fusion Detection With Whole-Transcriptome Sequencing at an Academic Cancer Center.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- An accurate DNA and RNA based targeted sequencing assay for clinical detection of gene fusions in solid tumors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Maine Cancer Genomics Initiative: Implementing a Community Cancer Genomics Program Across an Entire Rural State.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
- Recent advances in cancer fusion transcript detection.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) has gained prominence for the detection of fusions in solid tumors. Here, we describe the development and validation of an in-house RNA-Seq-based test system (FusionSeq™ 2.0) for the detection of clinically actionable gene fusions, in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, using seventy tumor samples with varying fusion status. Conditions were optimized for RNA input of 50 ng, shown to be adequate to call known fusions at as low as 20% neoplastic content. Evaluation of assay performance between FFPE and fresh-frozen (FF) tissues exhibited little to no difference in fusion calling capability. Performance analysis of the assay validation data determined 100% accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. This clinically developed and validated RNA-Seq-based approach for fusion detection in FPPE samples was shown to be on par if not superior to off-the-shelf commercially offered assays. With gene fusions implicated in a variety of cancer types, offering high-quality, low-cost molecular testing services for FFPE specimens will serve to best benefit the patient and the advancement of precision medicine in molecular oncology. KEY MESSAGES: A custom RNA-Seq-based test system (FusionSeq™ 2.0) for the detection of clinically actionable gene fusions, Evaluation of assay performance between FFPE and fresh-frozen (FF) tissues exhibited little to no difference in fusion calling capability. The assay can be performed with low RNA input and neoplastic content. Performance characteristics of the assay validation data determined 100% accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.