Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013736›Full record

ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2022

Anticipating hopes, fears and expectations towards COVID-19 vaccines: A qualitative interview study in seven European countries.

Katharina T Paul, Bettina M Zimmermann, Paolo Corsico, Amelia Fiske, Susi Geiger, Stephanie Johnson, Janneke M L Kuiper, Elisa Lievevrouw, Luca Marelli, Barbara Prainsack and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Katharina T PaulCentre for the Study of Contemporary Solidarity (CeSCoS), Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Austria.
Bettina M ZimmermannInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Paolo CorsicoCentre for Social Ethics and Policy, Department of Law, School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Amelia FiskeInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Germany.
Susi GeigerMISFIRES Project, College of Business, University College Dublin, Ireland.
Stephanie JohnsonEthox Centre and Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Janneke M L KuiperLife Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research (CeSO), KU Leuven, Belgium.
Elisa LievevrouwLife Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research (CeSO), KU Leuven, Belgium.
Luca MarelliLife Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research (CeSO), KU Leuven, Belgium.
Barbara PrainsackCentre for the Study of Contemporary Solidarity (CeSCoS), Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Austria.
Wanda SpahlCentre for the Study of Contemporary Solidarity (CeSCoS), Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Austria.
Ine Van HoyweghenLife Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research (CeSO), KU Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEUniversity of Vienna · ATTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF V 561Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 1433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccine uptake is essential to managing the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and vaccine hesitancy is a persistent concern. At the same time, both decision-makers and the general population have high hopes for COVID-19 vaccination. Drawing from qualitative interview data collected in October 2020 as part of the pan-European SolPan study, this study explores early and anticipatory expectations, hopes and fears regarding COVID-19 vaccination across seven European countries. We find that stances towards COVID-19 vaccines were shaped by personal lived experiences, but participants also aligned personal and communal interests in their considerations. Trust, particularly in expert institutions, was an important prerequisite for vaccine acceptance, but participants also expressed doubts about the rapid vaccine development process. Our findings emphasise the need to move beyond the study of factors driving vaccine hesitancy, and instead to focus on how people personally perceive vaccination in their particular social and political context.

Indexed as

EuropePandemicQualitative researchSARS-CoV-2Vaccination policyVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID35013736
PMCPMC8731673
OpenAlexW4205618208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.