Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013649›Full record

ArticleNeural computing & applications2022

Multi-criteria text mining model for COVID-19 testing reasons and symptoms and temporal predictive model for COVID-19 test results in rural communities.

Laith Abu Lekham, Yong Wang, Ellen Hey, Mohammad T Khasawneh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural computing & applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gaps in artificial intelligence research for rural health in the United States: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laith Abu LekhamSystems Science and Industrial Engineering Department, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, USA.
Yong WangSystems Science and Industrial Engineering Department, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1829-3836
Ellen HeyFinger Lakes Community Health, Geneva, USA.
Mohammad T KhasawnehSystems Science and Industrial Engineering Department, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, USA.
Binghamton University · USVA Finger Lakes Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is conducted to build a multi-criteria text mining model for COVID-19 testing reasons and symptoms. The model is integrated with a temporal predictive classification model for COVID-19 test results in rural underserved areas. A dataset of 6895 testing appointments and 14 features is used in this study. The text mining model classifies the notes related to the testing reasons and reported symptoms into one or more categories using look-up wordlists and a multi-criteria mapping process. The model converts an unstructured feature to a categorical feature that is used in building the temporal predictive classification model for COVID-19 test results and conducting some population analytics. The classification model is a temporal model (ordered and indexed by testing date) that uses machine learning classifiers to predict test results that are either positive or negative. Two types of classifiers and performance measures that include balanced and regular methods are used: (1) balanced random forest and (2) balanced bagged decision tree. The balanced or weighted methods are used to address and account for the biased and imbalanced dataset and to ensure correct detection of patients with COVID-19 (minority class). The model is tested in two stages using validation and testing sets to ensure robustness and reliability. The balanced classifiers outperformed regular classifiers using the balanced performance measures (balanced accuracy and G-score), which means the balanced classifiers are better at detecting patients with positive COVID-19 results. The balanced random forest achieved the best average balanced accuracy (86.1%) and G-score (86.1%) using the validation set. The balanced bagged decision tree achieved the best average balanced accuracy (83.0%) and G-score (82.8%) using the testing set. Also, it was found that the patient history, age, testing reasons, and time are the key features to classify the testing results.

Indexed as

ClassificationCommunity healthMachine learningPopulation health analyticsPrimary careText mining

Identifiers

PMID35013649
PMCPMC8729325
OpenAlexW4206754054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.