Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013600›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2022

Partitioning RNAs by length improves transcriptome reconstruction from short-read RNA-seq data.

Francisca Rojas Ringeling, Shounak Chakraborty, Caroline Vissers, Derek Reiman, Akshay M Patel, Ki-Heon Lee, Ari Hong, Chan-Woo Park, Tim Reska, Julien Gagneur and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Francisca Rojas Ringeling *Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-9768
Shounak Chakraborty *Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Caroline VissersDepartment of Biochemistry & Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Derek ReimanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7955-3980
Akshay M PatelGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3687-3383
Ki-Heon LeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Ari HongCenter for RNA Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3390-9395
Chan-Woo ParkDepartment of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Tim ReskaGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Julien GagneurDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8924-8365
Hyeshik ChangCenter for RNA Research, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9812-8015
Maria L SpletterBiomedical Center, Department of Physiological Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Martinsried-Planegg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2068-3350
Ki-Jun YoonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Guo-Li MingDepartment of Neuroscience and Mahoney Institute for Neurosciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2517-6075
Hongjun SongDepartment of Neuroscience and Mahoney Institute for Neurosciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8720-5310
Stefan CanzarGene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany. canzar@genzentrum.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4719-8010

Funding

Continuous Neurogenesis in the Mammalian HippocampusR35NS116843 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HONGJUN SONG · 2020 to 2026
$6.9M
Functional roles of genetic risk factors for brain disorders in neurogenesis and neurodevelopmentR35NS097370 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MING, GUO-LI · 2017 to 2024
$6.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS097370NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116843
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of methods for assembling transcripts from short-read RNA sequencing data is limited by the lack of long-range information. Here we introduce Ladder-seq, an approach that separates transcripts according to their lengths before sequencing and uses the additional information to improve the quantification and assembly of transcripts. Using simulated data, we show that a kallisto algorithm extended to process Ladder-seq data quantifies transcripts of complex genes with substantially higher accuracy than conventional kallisto. For reference-based assembly, a tailored scheme based on the StringTie2 algorithm reconstructs a single transcript with 30.8% higher precision than its conventional counterpart and is more than 30% more sensitive for complex genes. For de novo assembly, a similar scheme based on the Trinity algorithm correctly assembles 78% more transcripts than conventional Trinity while improving precision by 78%. In experimental data, Ladder-seq reveals 40% more genes harboring isoform switches compared to conventional RNA sequencing and unveils widespread changes in isoform usage upon m

Indexed as

RNATranscriptomeGene Expression ProfilingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingProtein IsoformsRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNAProtein IsoformsRNA

Identifiers

PMID35013600
PMCPMC11332977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.