Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013567›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2022

From systems to structure - using genetic data to model protein structures.

Hannes Braberg, Ignacia Echeverria, Robyn M Kaake, Andrej Sali, Nevan J Krogan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Contextual AI models for single-cell protein biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Newly discovered variants in unexplained neonatal encephalopathy.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Oligomerization of Monoamine Transporters.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannes BrabergDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7070-2257
Ignacia EcheverriaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4717-1467
Robyn M KaakeDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8341-3067
Andrej SaliQuantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0435-6197
Nevan J KroganDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. nevan.krogan@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4902-337X

Funding

SARS-CoV adaptations through a Systems Biology Lens (SYBIL)U19AI135972 · NIAID · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Adolfo Garcia-Sastre · 2018 to 2026
$27.2M
RESEARCH PROJECT 2U19AI135990 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Nevan J Krogan · 2018 to 2026
$21.4M
The Psychiatric Cell Map Initiative: Connecting Genomics, Subcellular Networks, and Higher Order PhenotypesU01MH115747 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KAMPMANN, MARTIN, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2018 to 2022
$19.6M
TR&D Project 4. The Imaging Stage: Multiscale Spatiotemporal Modeling of Macromolecular Systems in Cellular NeighborhoodsP41GM109824 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI ROUT, MICHAEL P · 2014 to 2023
$18.8M
X-ray Screening and Rapid Structure DeterminationP50AI150476 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2019 to 2021
$14.4M
Using Networks to Seed Hierarchical Whole-cell Models of CancerU54CA209891 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI IDEKER, TREY, KROGAN, NEVAN J · 2017 to 2021
$10.9M
Project 3: Autophagy dysfunction and neuronal activity in FTDU54NS100717 · NINDS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI GAN, LI · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
IMP: Software for Hybrid Determination of Macromolecular Assembly StructuresR01GM083960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SALI, ANDREJ · 2008 to 2024
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209891NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI150476NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135972NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI135990NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM109824NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083960NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH115747NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS100717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the effects of genetic variation is a fundamental problem in biology that requires methods to analyse both physical and functional consequences of sequence changes at systems-wide and mechanistic scales. To achieve a systems view, protein interaction networks map which proteins physically interact, while genetic interaction networks inform on the phenotypic consequences of perturbing these protein interactions. Until recently, understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie these interactions often required biophysical methods to determine the structures of the proteins involved. The past decade has seen the emergence of new approaches based on coevolution, deep mutational scanning and genome-scale genetic or chemical-genetic interaction mapping that enable modelling of the structures of individual proteins or protein complexes. Here, we review the emerging use of large-scale genetic datasets and deep learning approaches to model protein structures and their interactions, and discuss the integration of structural data from different sources.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MapsProteinsEpistasis, GeneticGene Regulatory NetworksMutationProtein Interaction MappingProteins

Identifiers

PMID35013567
PMCPMC8744059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.