Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013527›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2022

Deep convolutional neural network-based classification of cancer cells on cytological pleural effusion images.

Xiaofeng Xie, Chi-Cheng Fu, Lei Lv, Qiuyi Ye, Yue Yu, Qu Fang, Liping Zhang, Likun Hou, Chunyan Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Diagnosis of Lung Diseases in the Artificial Intelligence Era.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaofeng XieDepartment of Pathology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Chi-Cheng FuShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Lei LvShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Qiuyi YeShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Yue YuShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Qu FangShanghai Aitrox Technology Corporation Limited, Shanghai, China.
Liping ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Likun HouDepartment of Pathology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Chunyan WuDepartment of Pathology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China. wuchunyan581@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4488-8956
Tongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Cytology plays an important role in the initial evaluation and diagnosis of patients with lung cancer. However, due to the subjectivity of cytopathologists and the region-dependent diagnostic levels, the low consistency of liquid-based cytological diagnosis results in certain proportions of misdiagnoses and missed diagnoses. In this study, we performed a weakly supervised deep learning method for the classification of benign and malignant cells in lung cytological images through a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). A total of 404 cases of lung cancer cells in effusion cytology specimens from Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital were investigated, in which 266, 78, and 60 cases were used as the training, validation and test sets, respectively. The proposed method was evaluated on 60 whole-slide images (WSIs) of lung cancer pleural effusion specimens. This study showed that the method had an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity respectively of 91.67%, 87.50% and 94.44% in classifying malignant and benign lesions (or normal). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was 0.9526 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9019-9.9909). In contrast, the average accuracies of senior and junior cytopathologists were 98.34% and 83.34%, respectively. The proposed deep learning method will be useful and may assist pathologists with different levels of experience in the diagnosis of cancer cells on cytological pleural effusion images in the future.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPleural EffusionChinaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID35013527
PMCPMC9042694
OpenAlexW4206501481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.