Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013506›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2022

A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of a brief motivational intervention to promote breastfeeding in postpartum depression.

C Franco-Antonio, E Santano-Mogena, S Chimento-Díaz, P Sánchez-García, S Cordovilla-Guardia

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Breastfeeding interventions for preventing postpartum depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C Franco-AntonioNursing Department, Nursing and Occupational Therapy College, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
E Santano-MogenaNursing Department, Nursing and Occupational Therapy College, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain. esantano@unex.es.
S Chimento-DíazHealth and Care Research Group (GISyC), Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
P Sánchez-GarcíaHealth and Care Research Group (GISyC), Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
S Cordovilla-GuardiaNursing Department, Nursing and Occupational Therapy College, Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain.
Universidad de Extremadura · ES

Funding

Johnson & Johnson International Confederation of Midwives Research Award 2018Programa Operativo FEDER Extremadura (2014-2020) y Fondo Europeo Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) GR18146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postpartum depression (PPD) is the most frequent psychiatric complication during the postnatal period. According to existing evidence, an association exists between the development of PPD and the maintenance of breastfeeding. A brief motivational intervention (bMI), based on the motivational interview, seems effective in promoting breastfeeding. The objective of this study was to analyse the impact of a bMI aiming to promote breastfeeding on the development of PPD and explore the mediating/moderating roles of breastfeeding and breastfeeding self-efficacy in the effect of the intervention on developing PPD. Eighty-eight women who gave birth by vaginal delivery and started breastfeeding during the immediate postpartum period were randomly assigned to the intervention group (bMI) or control group (breastfeeding education). Randomisation by minimisation was carried out. The breastfeeding duration was longer in the intervention group (11.06 (± 2.94) weeks vs 9.02 (± 4.44), p = 0.013). The bMI was associated with a lower score on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, with a regression β coefficient of - 2.12 (95% CI - 3.82; - 0.41). A part of this effect was mediated by the effect of the intervention on the duration of breastfeeding (mediation/moderation index β = - 0.57 (95% CI - 1.30; - 0.04)). These findings suggest that a bMI aiming to promote breastfeeding has a positive impact preventing PPD mainly due to its effectiveness in increasing the duration of breastfeeding.

Indexed as

AffectMotivational InterviewingPsychotherapy, BriefAdultBreast FeedingDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansSpainTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35013506
PMCPMC8748452
OpenAlexW4205555515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.