Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013492›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2022

New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures.

Gaetano Caruso, Nicola Corradi, Antonio Caldaria, Daniele Bottin, Dario Lo Re, Vincenzo Lorusso, Chiara Morotti, Giorgia Valpiani, Leo Massari

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Gaetano CarusoDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy. crsgtn@unife.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6665-5283
Nicola CorradiDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Antonio CaldariaDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Daniele BottinOrthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Dario Lo ReDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Vincenzo LorussoOrthopaedic and Traumatology Unit, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Chiara MorottiResearch and Innovation Office, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Giorgia ValpianiResearch and Innovation Office, S. Anna University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Leo MassariDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro 8, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
University of Ferrara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cut-out is one of the most common mechanical failures in the internal fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. The tip-apex distance (TAD), and the calcar-referenced tip apex distance (CalTAD) are the radiographic parameters that most predict the risk of cut-out. The optimal CalTAD value has not yet been defined, but the optimal TAD value is reported as 25 mm or less. However, this cut-off is highly specific but poorly sensitive. The aim of this study was to determine highly specific and sensitive TAD and CalTAD values and shed light on the role of other clinical variables. A total of 604 patients were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. For each patient the following data were recorded: number of cut-out, AO/OTA classification, quality of the reduction, type of nail, cervicodiaphyseal angle, type of distal locking, post-operative weight-bearing, TAD and CalTAD values, and the position of the screw head in the femoral head according to the Cleveland system. The incidence of cut-out across the sample was 3.1%. The median TAD in the cut-out group was 38.72, while in the no cut-out group it was 22.16. The median CalTAD in the cut-out group was 39.34, while in the no cut-out group it was 22.19. The cut-off values for TAD and CalTAD with highest value of sensitivity and specificity for the risk of cut-out were 34.8 and 35.2, respectively. The incidence of cut-out can be reduced by performing careful minimal reduction and ensuring stable fixation by avoiding TAD > 34.8 mm and CalTAD > 35.2 mm.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsProsthesis FailureAgedAged, 80 and overAnatomic LandmarksCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleFemurFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35013492
PMCPMC8748913
OpenAlexW4206774152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.