Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A novel deep learning-based 3D cell segmentation framework for future image-based disease detection.

Andong Wang, Qi Zhang, Yang Han, Sean Megason, Sahand Hormoz, Kishore R Mosaliganti, Jacqueline C K Lam, Victor O K Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Leveraging AI for cell biology discovery.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andong Wang *Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Qi Zhang *Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Yang HanDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Sean MegasonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sahand HormozDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kishore R MosaligantiDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacqueline C K LamDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. jcklam@eee.hklu.hk.
Victor O K LiDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. vli@eee.hku.hk.
University of Hong Kong · HKHarvard University · US

Funding

Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee T41-709/17-N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell segmentation plays a crucial role in understanding, diagnosing, and treating diseases. Despite the recent success of deep learning-based cell segmentation methods, it remains challenging to accurately segment densely packed cells in 3D cell membrane images. Existing approaches also require fine-tuning multiple manually selected hyperparameters on the new datasets. We develop a deep learning-based 3D cell segmentation pipeline, 3DCellSeg, to address these challenges. Compared to the existing methods, our approach carries the following novelties: (1) a robust two-stage pipeline, requiring only one hyperparameter; (2) a light-weight deep convolutional neural network (3DCellSegNet) to efficiently output voxel-wise masks; (3) a custom loss function (3DCellSeg Loss) to tackle the clumped cell problem; and (4) an efficient touching area-based clustering algorithm (TASCAN) to separate 3D cells from the foreground masks. Cell segmentation experiments conducted on four different cell datasets show that 3DCellSeg outperforms the baseline models on the ATAS (plant), HMS (animal), and LRP (plant) datasets with an overall accuracy of 95.6%, 76.4%, and 74.7%, respectively, while achieving an accuracy comparable to the baselines on the Ovules (plant) dataset with an overall accuracy of 82.2%. Ablation studies show that the individual improvements in accuracy is attributable to 3DCellSegNet, 3DCellSeg Loss, and TASCAN, with the 3DCellSeg demonstrating robustness across different datasets and cell shapes. Our results suggest that 3DCellSeg can serve a powerful biomedical and clinical tool, such as histo-pathological image analysis, for cancer diagnosis and grading.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneDeep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopyAnimalsArabidopsisEmbryo, NonmammalianPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID35013443
PMCPMC8748745
OpenAlexW4206353330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.