Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013421›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Two-step screening method to identify α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors for Parkinson's disease.

Makoto Hideshima, Yasuyoshi Kimura, César Aguirre, Keita Kakuda, Toshihide Takeuchi, Chi-Jing Choong, Junko Doi, Kei Nabekura, Keiichi Yamaguchi, Kichitaro Nakajima and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Lysophagy protects against propagation of α-synuclein aggregation through ruptured lysosomal vesicles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Alpha Synuclein: Neurodegeneration and Inflammation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Makoto HideshimaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yasuyoshi KimuraDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
César AguirreDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Keita KakudaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Toshihide TakeuchiDepartment of Neurology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Chi-Jing ChoongDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Junko DoiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kei NabekuraDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Keiichi YamaguchiGlobal Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kichitaro NakajimaGlobal Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kousuke BabaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Seiichi NaganoDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuji GotoGlobal Center for Medical Engineering and Informatics, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yoshitaka NagaiDepartment of Neurology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-Higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
Hideki MochizukiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. hmochizuki@neurol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Kensuke IkenakaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. ikenaka@neurol.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology JPMJCR17H6Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology JPMJCR18H4Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP18hm0102037Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP19dm0207070Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Core-to-Core Program AJapan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17H05700Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP18H02741Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation Project Medical Evolution Expedited Tackle (MEET)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by the formation of neuronal inclusions of α-synuclein in patient brains. As the disease progresses, toxic α-synuclein aggregates transmit throughout the nervous system. No effective disease-modifying therapy has been established, and preventing α-synuclein aggregation is thought to be one of the most promising approaches to ameliorate the disease. In this study, we performed a two-step screening using the thioflavin T assay and a cell-based assay to identify α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors. The first screening, thioflavin T assay, allowed the identification of 30 molecules, among a total of 1262 FDA-approved small compounds, which showed inhibitory effects on α-synuclein fibrilization. In the second screening, a cell-based aggregation assay, seven out of these 30 candidates were found to prevent α-synuclein aggregation without causing substantial toxicity. Of the seven final candidates, tannic acid was the most promising compound. The robustness of our screening method was validated by a primary neuronal cell model and a Caenorhabditis elegans model, which demonstrated the effect of tannic acid against α-synuclein aggregation. In conclusion, our two-step screening system is a powerful method for the identification of α-synuclein aggregation inhibitors, and tannic acid is a promising candidate as a disease-modifying drug for Parkinson's disease.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysProtein Aggregation, Pathologicalalpha-SynucleinAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedAntiparkinson AgentsBenzothiazolesBiological AssayCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsDisease Models, AnimalDrug RepositioningHeLa CellsHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLalpha-SynucleinAntiparkinson AgentsBenzothiazolesCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsProtein AggregatesTanninsthioflavin T

Identifiers

PMID35013421
PMCPMC8748996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.