Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013403›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Blood meal analysis of Anopheles vectors of simian malaria based on laboratory and field studies.

Nantha Kumar Jeyaprakasam, Van Lun Low, Jonathan Wee Kent Liew, Sandthya Pramasivan, Wan-Yusoff Wan-Sulaiman, Atiporn Saeung, Indra Vythilingam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Impact of peri-urban pig farms on mosquito community structure in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic Diversity, Haplotype Relationships, andTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  16. Feeding Behavior andIranian journal of parasitology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nantha Kumar JeyaprakasamDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Van Lun LowTropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jonathan Wee Kent LiewDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Sandthya PramasivanDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Wan-Yusoff Wan-SulaimanDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Atiporn SaeungDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Center of Insect Vector Study, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Indra VythilingamDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. indrav@um.edu.my.
University of Malaya · MYChiang Mai University · THUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia grant no. LRGS 1/2018/UM/01/1/3.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood feeding and host-seeking behaviors of a mosquito play an imperative role in determining its vectorial capacity in transmitting pathogens. Unfortunately, limited information is available regarding blood feeding behavior of Anopheles species in Malaysia. Collection of resting Anopheles mosquitoes for blood meal analysis poses a great challenge especially for forest dwelling mosquitoes. Therefore, a laboratory-based study was conducted to evaluate the potential use of mosquitoes caught using human landing catch (HLC) for blood meal analysis, and subsequently to document blood feeding behavior of local Anopheles mosquitoes in Peninsular Malaysia. The laboratory-based experiment from this study revealed that mosquitoes caught using HLC had the potential to be used for blood meal analysis. Besides HLC, mosquitoes were also collected using manual aspirator and Mosquito Magnet. Overall, 47.4% of 321 field-caught Anopheles mosquitoes belonging to six species were positive for vertebrate host DNA in their blood meal. The most frequent blood meal source was human (45.9%) followed by wild boar (27.4%), dog (15.3%) and monkey (7.5%). Interestingly, only Anopheles cracens and Anopheles introlatus (Leucosphyrus Group) fed on monkey. This study further confirmed that members of the Leucosphyrus Group are the predominant vectors for knowlesi malaria transmission in Peninsular Malaysia mainly due to their simio-anthropophagic feeding behavior.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorPolymerase Chain ReactionAnimalsAnophelesDNAHaplorhiniHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansInsect VectorsMalariaMonkey DiseasesPlasmodium knowlesiSus scrofaDNA

Identifiers

PMID35013403
PMCPMC8748441
OpenAlexW4206804841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.