Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013390›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Persistently high hepatitis C rates in haemodialysis patients in Brazil [a systematic review and meta-analysis].

Roberta Pereira Niquini, Jurema Corrêa da Mota, Leonardo Soares Bastos, Diego da Costa Moreira Barbosa, Juliane da Silva Falcão, Paloma Palmieri, Patrícia Martins, Livia Melo Villar, Francisco I Bastos

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberta Pereira NiquiniFederal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jurema Corrêa da MotaInstitute of Scientific and Technological Communication and Information in Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ICICT-FIOCRUZ), Biblioteca de Manguinhos suite 229, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, 21045-900, Brazil.
Leonardo Soares BastosProgram for Scientific Computing, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (PROCC-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Diego da Costa Moreira BarbosaFederal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Juliane da Silva FalcãoFederal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paloma PalmieriInstitute of Scientific and Technological Communication and Information in Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ICICT-FIOCRUZ), Biblioteca de Manguinhos suite 229, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, 21045-900, Brazil.
Patrícia MartinsLaboratory of Viral Hepatitis, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IOC-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Livia Melo VillarLaboratory of Viral Hepatitis, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (IOC-FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Francisco I BastosInstitute of Scientific and Technological Communication and Information in Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ICICT-FIOCRUZ), Biblioteca de Manguinhos suite 229, Av. Brasil 4365, Rio de Janeiro, 21045-900, Brazil. francisco.inacio.bastos@hotmail.com.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRRio de Janeiro Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology · BR

Funding

Newton Fund ("Institutional Links" initiative) VPPCB-006-FIO-20-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies assessing HCV infection rates in haemodialysis patients in Brazil (Prospero CRD #42021275068). We included studies on patients under haemodialysis, comprising both convenience samples and exhaustive information from selected services. Patients underwent HCV serological testing with or without confirmation by HCV RNA PCR. Exclusion criteria were the following: absence of primary empirical information and studies without information on their respective settings, study year, accurate infection rates, or full specification of diagnostic tests. Studies with samples ≤ 30 and serial assessments with repeated information were also excluded. Reference databases included PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science for the period 1989-2019. A systematic review was carried out, followed by two independent meta-analyses: (i) studies with data on HCV prevalence and (ii) studies with a confirmatory PCR (i.e., active infection), respectively. A comprehensive set of different methods and procedures were used: forest plots and respective statistics, polynomial regression, meta-regression, subgroup influence, quality assessment, and trim-and-fill analysis. 29 studies and 11,290 individuals were assessed. The average time patients were in haemodialysis varied from 23.5 to 56.3 months. Prevalence of HCV infection was highly heterogeneous, with a pronounced decrease from 1992 to 2001, followed by a plateau and a slight decrease in recent years. The summary measure for HCV prevalence was 34% (95% CI 26-43%) for studies implemented before 2001. For studies implemented after 2001, the corresponding summary measure was 11% (95% CI 8-15%). Estimates for prevalence of active HCV infection were also highly heterogeneous. There was a marked decline from 1996 to 2001, followed by a plateau and a slight increase after 2010. The summary measure for active HCV infection was 19% (95% CI 15-25%) in studies carried out before 2001. For studies implemented after 2001, the corresponding summary measure was 9% (95% CI 6-13%). Heterogeneity was pervasive, but different analyses helped to identify its underlying sources. Besides the year each study was conducted, the findings differed markedly between geographic regions and were heavily influenced by the size of the studies and publication biases. Our systematic review and meta-analysis documented a substantial decline in HCV prevalence among Brazilian haemodialysis patients from 1992 to 2015. CKD should be targeted with specific interventions to prevent HCV infection, and if prevention fails, prompt diagnosis and treatment. Although the goal of HCV elimination by 2030 in Brazil remains elusive, it is necessary to adopt measures to achieve micro-elimination and to launch initiatives towards targeted interventions to curb the spread of HCV in people with CKD, among other high-risk groups. This is of particular concern in the context of a protracted COVID-19 pandemic and a major economic and political crisis.

Indexed as

BrazilCOVID-19HepacivirusHepatitis CHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPandemicsPrevalenceRenal DialysisRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2RNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID35013390
PMCPMC8748660
OpenAlexW4205902157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.