Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013351›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Rapid syndromic PCR testing in patients with respiratory tract infections reduces time to results and improves microbial yield.

S Serigstad, D Markussen, H M S Grewal, M Ebbesen, Ø Kommedal, L Heggelund, C H van Werkhoven, D Faurholt-Jepsen, T W Clark, C Ritz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Rapid commercial CTX-M diagnostics: Performance, limitations and clinical impact.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Clinical relevance of lung microbiota composition in critically ill children with acute lower respiratory tract infections: insights from a retrospective analysis of metagenomic sequencing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Candent issues in pneumonia. Reflections from the Fifth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2023.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
  18. Laboratory tools for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory infections and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

S SerigstadEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
D Markussen *Emergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
H M S GrewalDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, The New Lab. Building, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway. harleen.grewal@uib.no.
M Ebbesen *Department of Microbiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Ø KommedalDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, The New Lab. Building, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway.
L HeggelundDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, The New Lab. Building, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway.
C H van WerkhovenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
D Faurholt-JepsenDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, The New Lab. Building, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway.
T W ClarkSchool of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
C RitzDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, The New Lab. Building, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway.
E UlvestadDepartment of Clinical Science, Bergen Integrated Diagnostic Stewardship Cluster, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, The New Lab. Building, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway.
R BjørneklettEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
S T KnoopEmergency Care Clinic, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
CAPNOR Study Group
Haukeland University Hospital · NOUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKVestre Viken Hospital Trust · NOUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd NORCAP; 288718Trond Mohn stiftelse RESPNOR; BFS2019TMT06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of rapid and comprehensive microbiological diagnosis in patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) hampers appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This study evaluates the real-world performance of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia panel plus (FAP plus) and explores the feasibility of evaluation in a randomised controlled trial. Patients presenting to hospital with suspected CAP were recruited in a prospective feasibility study. An induced sputum or an endotracheal aspirate was obtained from all participants. The FAP plus turnaround time (TAT) and microbiological yield were compared with standard diagnostic methods (SDs). 96/104 (92%) enrolled patients had a respiratory tract infection (RTI); 72 CAP and 24 other RTIs. Median TAT was shorter for the FAP plus, compared with in-house PCR (2.6 vs 24.1 h, p < 0.001) and sputum cultures (2.6 vs 57.5 h, p < 0.001). The total microbiological yield by the FAP plus was higher compared to SDs (91% (162/179) vs 55% (99/179), p < 0.0001). Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and influenza A virus were the most frequent pathogens. In conclusion, molecular panel testing in adults with CAP was associated with a significant reduction in time to actionable results and increased microbiological yield. The impact on antibiotic use and patient outcome should be assessed in randomised controlled trials.

Indexed as

Multiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Decision-MakingCommunity-Acquired InfectionsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHaemophilus InfectionsHaemophilus influenzaeHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedPneumococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35013351
PMCPMC8748978
OpenAlexW4205100653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.