Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013233›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

The legacy of the extinct Neotropical megafauna on plants and biomes.

Vinicius L Dantas, Juli G Pausas

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vinicius L DantasInstitute of Geography, Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU), Av. João Naves de Avila, 2121, Uberlandia, 38400-902, MG, Brazil. viniciusldantas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6934-3277
Juli G PausasCentro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación, Spanish National Research Council (CIDE-CSIC), Ctra. Naquera Km. 4.5 (IVIA), Montcada, 46113, Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3533-5786

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large mammal herbivores are important drivers of plant evolution and vegetation patterns, but the extent to which plant trait and ecosystem geography currently reflect the historical distribution of extinct megafauna is unknown. We address this question for South and Central America (Neotropical biogeographic realm) by compiling data on plant defence traits, climate, soil, and fire, as well as on the historical distribution of extinct megafauna and extant mammal herbivores. We show that historical mammal herbivory, especially by extinct megafauna, and soil fertility explain substantial variability in wood density, leaf size, spines and latex. We also identified three distinct regions (''antiherbiomes''), differing in plant defences, environmental conditions, and megafauna history. These patterns largely matched those observed in African ecosystems, where abundant megafauna still roams, and suggest that some ecoregions experienced savanna-to-forest shifts following megafauna extinctions. Here, we show that extinct megafauna left a significant imprint on current ecosystem biogeography.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBiological CoevolutionExtinction, BiologicalAfricaAnimalsCentral AmericaEcosystemFiresForestsHerbivoryHistory, AncientMammalsPhylogeographyPlant Defense Against HerbivoryPlant DispersalPlant LeavesSoil

Identifiers

PMID35013233
PMCPMC8748933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.