Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35013185›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Mechanism for inverted-repeat recombination induced by a replication fork barrier.

Léa Marie, Lorraine S Symington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Fission Yeast Mating-Type Switching Motto: "One-for-Two" and "Two-for-One".Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Poxvirus Recombination.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Léa MarieDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4834-5265
Lorraine S SymingtonDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA. lss5@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-4800
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of CTIP in Lymphocyte Development and LymphomagenesisP01CA174653 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RABADAN, RAUL · 2014 to 2024
$17.6M
Mechanism and regulation of DNA double-strand break repairR35GM126997 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lorraine S Symington · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
Rad52-dependent recombination in response to replication stressR21ES030447 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SYMINGTON, LORRAINE S · 2019 to 2020
$446k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA174653NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES030447NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replication stress and abundant repetitive sequences have emerged as primary conditions underlying genomic instability in eukaryotes. To gain insight into the mechanism of recombination between repeated sequences in the context of replication stress, we used a prokaryotic Tus/Ter barrier designed to induce transient replication fork stalling near inverted repeats in the budding yeast genome. Our study reveals that the replication fork block stimulates a unique recombination pathway dependent on Rad51 strand invasion and Rad52-Rad59 strand annealing activities, Mph1/Rad5 fork remodelers, Mre11/Exo1/Dna2 resection machineries, Rad1-Rad10 nuclease and DNA polymerase δ. Furthermore, we show recombination at stalled replication forks is limited by the Srs2 helicase and Mus81-Mms4/Yen1 nucleases. Physical analysis of the replication-associated recombinants revealed that half are associated with an inversion of sequence between the repeats. Based on our extensive genetic characterization, we propose a model for recombination of closely linked repeats that can robustly generate chromosome rearrangements.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationGenomic InstabilityRecombination, GeneticChromosomesDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesEndonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesFlap EndonucleasesNeoplasmsRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA2 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA HelicasesEndonucleasesexodeoxyribonuclease IExodeoxyribonucleasesFlap EndonucleasesMMS4 protein, S cerevisiaeMPH1 protein, S cerevisiaeMUS81 protein, S cerevisiaeRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRAD52 protein, humanRAD52 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD59 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD5 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSRS2 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID35013185
PMCPMC8748988
OpenAlexW4205962915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.