ArticleThe Journal of craniofacial surgery
Cleft Lip and Palate Repair Training to Bridge the Gap in Low-Income Countries.
Article in The Journal of craniofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global Perspectives in Plastic Surgery: View of Plastic Surgeons From Peru.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Appropriate Characteristics for Cleft Palate Surgery by Chief Residency in Plastic Surgery Training Programs.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Burden of orofacial clefts from 1990-2021 at global, regional, and national levels.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Epidemiological and clinical evaluation of patients with a cleft in lower saxony Germany: a mono-center analysis.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Current Perspectives on Cleft Lip and Palate and Children's Health.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere is a significant unmet need for cleft repair in low-income countries. The procedure is challenging due to limited access, small fragile flaps, and the depth at which sutures need to be placed. The aim of this analysis is to review available literature pertaining to cleft lip and palate repair training, with a focus on those applicable to low-income countries. METHODOLOGY: Literature searches of Medline and EMBase were performed to identify studies of cleft lip and/or palate training. Terms including "cleft," "lip," "palate," and "training" were searched. Literature published in English from inception to May 2021 in which the full text was available was considered for inclusion. Studies were included on the basis that they included interventions such as virtual/online training, simulation training, courses, fellowships, and/or hospital-based training. Studies that met this criterion were further assessed using a validated scoring tool then the applicability of each training strategy for low-income countries reviewed.
resultsNineteen studies were included in this analysis. Of these 4 studies pertained to online training, 11 studies illustrated cleft models and simulation training, while 4 studies highlighted the role of charity led training achieved through direct hospital teaching and fellowship programs. The training strategies described have been summarised and presented herein in a narrative format. The simplicity, fidelity, and training benefit of palatoplasty models has also been described.
conclusionsCleft lip and palate repair training should be accessible to surgeons in low-income countries. Direct practical experience has an important role in training to perform cleft procedures. Affordable, simple simulation models that resemble human tissue are essential so that surgeons can safely practice skills between initial training and operating on a living child.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.