Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012986›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Multivalency enables unidirectional switch-like competition between intrinsically disordered proteins.

Rebecca B Berlow, H Jane Dyson, Peter E Wright

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Commonly asked questions about transcriptional activation domains.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Protein Binding: A Fuzzy Concept.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca B BerlowDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.ORCID 0000-0003-1934-0139
H Jane DysonDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.ORCID 0000-0001-6855-3398
Peter E WrightDepartment of Integrative Structural and Computational Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037; wright@scripps.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1368-0223
Scripps Research Institute · US

Funding

Structural basis for CBP/p300 transcriptional regulationR01CA096865 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WRIGHT, PETER EDWIN · 2002 to 2016
$6.2M
Structural Studies of Large Dynamic ComplexesR35GM131693 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI DYSON, HELEN JANE · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Molecular Basis for Regulation of Cellular Stress Response Pathways by CBP/p300R01CA229652 · NCI · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WRIGHT, PETER EDWIN · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096865NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229652NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins must compete for binding to common regulatory targets to carry out their biological functions. Previously, we showed that the activation domains of two disordered proteins, the transcription factor HIF-1α and its negative regulator CITED2, function as a unidirectional, allosteric molecular switch to control transcription of critical adaptive genes under conditions of oxygen deprivation. These proteins achieve transcriptional control by competing for binding to the TAZ1 domain of the transcriptional coactivators CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 (CREB: cyclic-AMP response element binding protein). To characterize the mechanistic details behind this molecular switch, we used solution NMR spectroscopy and complementary biophysical methods to determine the contributions of individual binding motifs in CITED2 to the overall competition process. An N-terminal region of the CITED2 activation domain, which forms a helix when bound to TAZ1, plays a critical role in initiating competition with HIF-1α by enabling formation of a ternary complex in a process that is highly dependent on the dynamics and disorder of the competing partners. Two other conserved binding motifs in CITED2, the LPEL motif and an aromatic/hydrophobic motif that we term ϕC, function synergistically to enhance binding of CITED2 and inhibit rebinding of HIF-1α. The apparent unidirectionality of competition between HIF-1α and CITED2 is lost when one or more of these binding regions is altered by truncation or mutation of the CITED2 peptide. Our findings illustrate the complexity of molecular interactions involving disordered proteins containing multivalent interaction motifs and provide insight into the unique mechanisms by which disordered proteins compete for occupancy of common molecular targets within the cell.

Indexed as

Binding, CompetitiveAmino Acid MotifsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsKineticsMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMiceMutationPeptidesRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Coactivator with PDZ-Binding Motif ProteinsCITED2 protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsPeptidesRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional Coactivator with PDZ-Binding Motif ProteinsWWTR1 protein, humanallosterybinding motifhypoxic responseprotein–protein interactiontranscriptional regulation

Identifiers

PMID35012986
PMCPMC8784115
OpenAlexW4206606634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.