Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012981›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Global evidence on the selfish rich inequality hypothesis.

Ingvild Almås, Alexander W Cappelen, Erik Ø Sørensen, Bertil Tungodden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The racial and ethnic gap in behavioral measures rivals the gender gap in the United States.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inequality aversion predicts support for public and private redistribution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ingvild AlmåsInstitute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6340-1384
Alexander W CappelenFAIR-Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3489-7085
Erik Ø SørensenFAIR-Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-4188
Bertil TungoddenFAIR-Centre for Experimental Research on Fairness, Inequality and Rationality, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway bertil.tungodden@nhh.no.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-8491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report on a study of whether people believe that the rich are richer than the poor because they have been more selfish in life, using data from more than 26,000 individuals in 60 countries. The findings show a strong belief in the selfish rich inequality hypothesis at the global level; in the majority of countries, the mode is to strongly agree with it. However, we also identify important between- and within-country variation. We find that the belief in selfish rich inequality is much stronger in countries with extensive corruption and weak institutions and less strong among people who are higher in the income distribution in their society. Finally, we show that the belief in selfish rich inequality is predictive of people's policy views on inequality and redistribution: It is significantly positively associated with agreeing that inequality in their country is unfair, and it is significantly positively associated with agreeing that the government should aim to reduce inequality. These relationships are highly significant both across and within countries and robust to including country-level or individual-level controls and using Lasso-selected regressors. Thus, the data provide compelling evidence of people believing that the rich are richer because they have been more selfish in life and perceiving selfish behavior as creating unfair inequality and justifying equalizing policies.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSocioeconomic FactorsAgedHumansInternationalityMaleinequalityredistributionselfishness

Identifiers

PMID35012981
PMCPMC8784141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.