Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012946›Full record

ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2022

Maternal and neonatal trauma following operative vaginal delivery.

Giulia M Muraca, Amélie Boutin, Neda Razaz, Sarka Lisonkova, Sid John, Joseph Y Ting, Heather Scott, Michael S Kramer, K S Joseph

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Female pelvic floor protection-Where do we have to go?Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Giulia M MuracaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que. giulia.muraca@ki.se.
Amélie BoutinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Neda RazazDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Sarka LisonkovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Sid JohnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Joseph Y TingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Heather ScottDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Michael S KramerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
K S JosephDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Muraca, Boutin, Lisonkova, John, Joseph), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine (Muraca, Razaz), Solna, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pediatrics (Boutin), Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec; School of Population and Public Health (Lisonkova, Joseph); Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics (Ting), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Scott), Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS; Departments of Epidemiology and Occupation Health and of Pediatrics (Kramer), McGill University, Montréal, Que.
Dalhousie University · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR PER-150902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOperative vaginal delivery (OVD) is considered safe if carried out by trained personnel. However, opportunities for training in OVD have declined and, given these shifts in practice, the safety of OVD is unknown. We estimated incidence rates of trauma following OVD in Canada, and quantified variation in trauma rates by instrument, region, level of obstetric care and institutional OVD volume.

methodsWe conducted a cohort study of all singleton, term deliveries in Canada between April 2013 and March 2019, excluding Quebec. Our main outcome measures were maternal trauma (e.g., obstetric anal sphincter injury, high vaginal lacerations) and neonatal trauma (e.g., subgaleal hemorrhage, brachial plexus injury). We calculated adjusted and stabilized rates of trauma using mixed-effects logistic regression.

resultsOf 1 326 191 deliveries, 38 500 (2.9%) were attempted forceps deliveries and 110 987 (8.4%) were attempted vacuum deliveries. The maternal trauma rate following forceps delivery was 25.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.8%-25.7%) and the neonatal trauma rate was 9.6 (95% CI 8.6-10.6) per 1000 live births. Maternal and neonatal trauma rates following vacuum delivery were 13.2% (95% CI 13.0%-13.4%) and 9.6 (95% CI 9.0-10.2) per 1000 live births, respectively. Maternal trauma rates remained higher with forceps than with vacuum after adjustment for confounders (adjusted rate ratio 1.70, 95% CI 1.65-1.75) and varied by region, but not by level of obstetric care.

interpretationIn Canada, rates of trauma following OVD are higher than previously reported, irrespective of region, level of obstetric care and volume of OVD among hospitals. These results support a reassessment of OVD safety in Canada.

Indexed as

Anal CanalBirth InjuriesCanadaFemaleHumansIncidenceIntracranial HemorrhagesLacerationsNeonatal Brachial Plexus PalsyObstetrical ForcepsObstetric Labor ComplicationsPelvisPregnancySkull FracturesTrauma, Nervous SystemUrethra

Identifiers

PMID35012946
PMCPMC8800478
OpenAlexW4205150760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.