ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2022
Risk analysis for radiotherapy at the Universitätsklinikum Erlangen.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of prospective hazard analysis in radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2025Pooled it
- Improving the safety of radiotherapy treatment processes via incident-driven FMEA feedback loops.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Prospective risk analysis of the online-adaptive artificial intelligence-driven workflow using the Ethos treatment system.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Development and clinical implementation of a digital system for risk assessments for radiation therapy.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Risk management in radiation-based therapies.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2024Article
- Unified risk analysis in radiation therapy.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRisk analysis is required by various laws and regulations in Germany and has an impact on each department of a large clinic. We provide an overview of the relevant laws and regulations in Germany and present the technical and organizational experience of introducing risk analysis in the Department of Radiation Oncology at the Universitätsklinikum Erlangen.
methodsRisk analysis was performed with an in-house developed extension of our intranet platform and ticketing system. Risks were classified according to occurrence and severity, each on a 5-level scale resulting into a risk matrix. An interdisciplinary team of six experienced members formed the core meeting weekly.
resultsA total of 38 risks and 50 measures have been identified in 41 1h-meetings corresponding to approx. 260 working hours. Risk was distributed 8/20/13 to the categories critical (n=8), monitoring (n=20), and conditionally acceptable (n=13). Risk analysis has been evaluated before and after introducing measures.
conclusionThe risk analysis method introduced has been successfully used in routine operations for over a year. Risk analysis takes time and effort. However, because experts from different disciplines meet each other every week, the overall workflow of the radiation oncology department can be improved efficiently and continuously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.