Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012641›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2022

Efficacy of mupirocin, neomycin and octenidine for nasal Staphylococcus aureus decolonisation: a retrospective cohort study.

J Allport, R Choudhury, P Bruce-Wootton, M Reed, D Tate, A Malviya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Surgical Site Infection in Cardiac Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J AllportNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, NE63 9JJ, UK. j.allport@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-1352-5896
R ChoudhuryNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, NE63 9JJ, UK.
P Bruce-WoottonNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, NE63 9JJ, UK.
M ReedNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, NE63 9JJ, UK.
D TateNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, NE63 9JJ, UK.
A MalviyaNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Trust, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wansbeck General Hospital, Woodhorn Lane, Ashington, NE63 9JJ, UK.
Wansbeck General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI) causes significant morbidity. Methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) is the most frequent organism, and the majority are endogenous. Decolonisation reduces PJIs but there is a paucity of evidence comparing treatments. Aims; compare 3 nasal decolonisation treatments at (1) achieving MSSA decolonisation, (2) preventing PJI.

methodsOur hospital prospectively collected data on our MSSA decolonisation programme since 2013, including; all MSSA carriers, treatment received, MSSA status at time of surgery and all PJIs. Prior to 2017 MSSA carriers received nasal mupirocin or neomycin, from August 2017 until August 2019 nasal octenidine was used.

resultsDuring the study period 15,958 primary hip and knee replacements were performed. 3200 (20.1%) were MSSA positive at preoperative screening and received decolonisation treatment, 698 mupirocin, 1210 neomycin and 1221 octenidine. Mupirocin (89.1%) and neomycin (90.9%) were more effective at decolonisation than octenidine (50.0%, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in PJI rates (P = 0.452).

conclusionsMupirocin and neomycin are more effective than octenidine at MSSA decolonisation. There was poor correlation between the MSSA status after treatment (on day of surgery) and PJI rates. Further research is needed to compare alternative MSSA decolonisation treatments.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalCohort StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEnglandIminesJoint DiseasesMethicillinMupirocinNeomycinNose DiseasesPyridinesRetrospective StudiesStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalIminesMethicillinMupirocinNeomycinoctenidinePyridinesDecolonisationMethicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureusMSSAPeriprosthetic joint infectionSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID35012641
PMCPMC8744346
OpenAlexW4206717593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.