Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012617›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2022

Predictive factors of endometriosis progression into ovarian cancer.

Ján Varga, Alžbeta Reviczká, Hedviga Háková, Peter Švajdler, Miroslava Rabajdová, Alexander Ostró

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Dienogest use and the risk of breast and gynecologic cancers: A nationwide population-based study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ján VargaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, P.J. Šafárik University and L. Pasteur University Hospital, Rastislavova 43 Street, 041 90, Košice, Slovakia. janko.varga@gmail.com.
Alžbeta ReviczkáFrauenklinik, DONAUISAR Klinikum Deggendorf, Deggendorf, Germany.
Hedviga HákováDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, subdivision of Medical Genetics L. Pasteur University Hospital, Košice, Slovakia.
Peter ŠvajdlerCYTOPATHOS, s.r.o, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Miroslava RabajdováDepartment of Medical and Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia.
Alexander OstróDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, P.J. Šafárik University and L. Pasteur University Hospital, Rastislavova 43 Street, 041 90, Košice, Slovakia.
University of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SKDeggendorf Institute of Technology · DEUniverzitná Nemocnica Louisa Pasteura · SK

Funding

KEGA KEGA 026SPU-4/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, the endometriosis has overcome a noteworthy renaissance in the recognition of its potential. In certain patients, a demonstrable malignant progression of ectopic foci leading to development of ovarian cancer is seen. The knowledge of endometriosis overthrow background into endometriosis associated ovarian cancer is of paramount importance for selection of patients at risk. The goal of the presented study was to review a malignant potential of the endometriosis and to specify predictive factors of endometriosis progression into ovarian cancer. Altogether 189 patients were included in the study. Conventional cytogenetics as well as measurement of transcriptional activity of CTNNB1 (β-catenin) and HIF1A (HIF1-α) genes were prospectively studied in 60 endometriosis patients and 50 control group patients. The retrospective histopathological analysis was performed in 19 endometriosis associated ovarian cancer patients and 60 patients with histologically confirmed endometriosis.

resultsFive endometriosis patients showed a deviation from normal cytogenetics finding without affecting of their phenotype. In 6 cases of endometriosis associated ovarian cancer ectopic endometrium was not confirmed. The remaining 13 cases demonstrated either benign or atypical endometriosis or even structures of borderline carcinoma. Atypical endometriosis was histologically confirmed in 20% of 60 endometriosis patients. Determination of gene expression (CTNNB1, HIF1A) formed two subgroups. Transcriptionally incipient endometriosis subgroup with insignificant genes expression compared to control group. In transcriptionally evident endometriosis subgroup were genes expressions significantly higher compared to control group (p < 0.01) as well as transcriptionally incipient endometriosis subgroup (p < 0.05).

conclusionsSignificant structural abnormalities of chromosomes are not included in genetic rigging of endometriosis patients. Atypical endometriosis represents a histopathologically detectable intermediate of endometriosis progression. Determination of genes expression CTNNB1 and HIF1A helps to allocate risk patients with endometriosis where more precise management is needed.

Indexed as

Adultbeta CateninDisease ProgressionEndometriosisFemaleHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsYoung Adultbeta CateninCTNNB1 protein, humanHIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitAtypical endometriosisConventional cytogeneticsCTNNB1EndometriosisEndometriosis associated ovarian cancerHIF1A

Identifiers

PMID35012617
PMCPMC8751310
OpenAlexW4206730020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.