Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012602›Full record

ReviewInternational journal for equity in health2022

"We are not stray leaves blowing about in the wind": exploring the impact of Family Wellbeing empowerment research, 1998-2021.

Nirukshi Perera, Komla Tsey, Marion Heyeres, Mary Whiteside, Leslie Baird, Janya McCalman, Yvonne Cadet-James, Bianca Calabria, Michael Hamilton, Li Yan and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nirukshi PereraResuscitation & Emergency Care Research Unit, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia.
Komla TseyThe Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Smithfield, QLD, Australia. komla.tsey@jcu.edu.au.
Marion HeyeresThe Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Smithfield, QLD, Australia.
Mary WhitesideOffice of Allied Health, Human Services & Sport, La Trobe University, VIC, Australia.
Leslie BairdThe Cairns Institute, James Cook University, Smithfield, QLD, Australia.
Janya McCalmanCentre for Indigenous Health Equity Research, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Psychology and Public Health Department, Central Queensland University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
Yvonne Cadet-JamesIndigenous Research and Education Centre, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Bianca CalabriaCollege of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Michael HamiltonBatchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education, Batchelor, NT, Australia.
Li YanCollege of Economics and Management, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang, China.
Ines ZuchowskiCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Kearrin SimsCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Smithfield, QLD, Australia.
Hyacinth UdahCollege of Arts, Society and Education, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn Aboriginal-developed empowerment and social and emotional wellbeing program, known as Family Wellbeing (FWB), has been found to strengthen the protective factors that help Indigenous Australians to deal with the legacy of colonisation and intergenerational trauma. This article reviews the research that has accompanied the implementation of the program, over a 23 year period. The aim is to assess the long-term impact of FWB research and identify the key enablers of research impact and the limitations of the impact assessment exercise. This will inform more comprehensive monitoring of research impact into the future.

methodsTo assess impact, the study took an implementation science approach, incorporating theory of change and service utilisation frameworks, to create a logic model underpinned by Indigenous research principles. A research impact narrative was developed based on mixed methods analysis of publicly available data on: 1) FWB program participation; 2) research program funding; 3) program outcome evaluation (nine studies); and 4) accounts of research utilisation (seven studies).

resultsStarting from a need for research on empowerment identified by research users, an investment of $2.3 million in research activities over 23 years produced a range of research outputs that evidenced social and emotional wellbeing benefits arising from participation in the FWB program. Accounts of research utilisation confirmed the role of research outputs in educating participants about the program, and thus, facilitating more demand (and funding acquisition) for FWB. Overall research contributed to 5,405 recorded participants accessing the intervention. The key enablers of research impact were; 1) the research was user- and community-driven; 2) a long-term mutually beneficial partnership between research users and researchers; 3) the creation of a body of knowledge that demonstrated the impact of the FWB intervention via different research methods; 4) the universality of the FWB approach which led to widespread application.

conclusionsThe FWB research impact exercise reinforced the view that assessing research impact is best approached as a "wicked problem" for which there are no easy fixes. It requires flexible, open-ended, collaborative learning-by-doing approaches to build the evidence base over time. Steps and approaches that research groups might take to build the research impact knowledge base within their disciplines are discussed.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchHealth Services, IndigenousAustraliaFamilyHumansAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healthEmpowermentImplementation scienceIndigenous healthLogic modelResearch evaluationResearch impactService utilisationSocial and emotional wellbeingTheory of change

Identifiers

PMID35012602
PMCPMC8744228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.