Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012530›Full record

ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2022

Is staff consistency important to parents' satisfaction in a longitudinal study of children at risk for type 1 diabetes: the TEDDY study.

Jessica Melin, Kristian F Lynch, Markus Lundgren, Carin Andrén Aronsson, Helena Elding Larsson, Suzanne Bennett Johnson, TEDDY Study Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00279318 (Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00279318 completednot on this map

Consortium for Identification of Environmental Triggers of Type 1 Diabetes

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Ran2004 to 2025Enrolled8,667ConditionsType 1 Diabetes Mellitus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Children's Understanding of Risk for Type 1 Diabetes: The TEDDY Study.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jessica MelinDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. jessica.melin@med.lu.se.
Kristian F LynchHealth Informatics Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Markus LundgrenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Carin Andrén AronssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Helena Elding LarssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Suzanne Bennett JohnsonDepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
TEDDY Study Group

Funding

Limited Competition: Continued Follow-up of Subjects and Initiation of a Second Case-control Cohort in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in The Young Study (TEDDY)U01DK128847 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI JEFFREY P KRISCHER · 2021 to 2026
$79.2M
Follow-up on Subjects, Integrative Data Analysis and Measurement of Viral Antibodies in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in The Young Study (TEDDY)U01DK124166 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2020 to 2022
$31.1M
NIDDK Follow-up on Subjects and Immunological Assessments in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes In The Young Study (TEDDY) (UC4)UC4DK117483 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KRISCHER, JEFFREY P · 2017 to 2020
$30.4M
The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in Young (TEDDY0U01DK063863 · NIDDK · HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SOUTHWEST FINLAND · PI TOPPARI, JORMA · 2003 to 2022
$13.5M
THE TEDDY STUDY - COLORADO CLINICAL CENTERU01DK063821 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI REWERS, MARIAN J · 2003 to 2022
$12.3M
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus DRCP30DK116073 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI LORI SUSSEL · 2020 to 2026
$10.8M
The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) StudyUC4DK063863 · NIDDK · HOSPITAL DISTRICT OF SOUTHWEST FINLAND · PI TOPPARI, JORMA · 2013 to 2013
$5.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK116073NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063821NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063863NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK124166NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK128847NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK063863NIDDK NIH HHS UC4 DK117483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipants' study satisfaction is important for both compliance with study protocols and retention, but research on parent study satisfaction is rare. This study sought to identify factors associated with parent study satisfaction in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study, a longitudinal, multinational (US, Finland, Germany, Sweden) study of children at risk for type 1 diabetes. The role of staff consistency to parent study satisfaction was a particular focus.

methodsParent study satisfaction was measured by questionnaire at child-age 15 months (5579 mothers, 4942 fathers) and child-age four years (4010 mothers, 3411 fathers). Multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify sociodemographic factors, parental characteristics, and study variables associated with parent study satisfaction at both time points.

resultsParent study satisfaction was highest in Sweden and the US, compared to Finland. Parents who had an accurate perception of their child's type 1 diabetes risk and those who believed they can do something to prevent type 1 diabetes were more satisfied. More educated parents and those with higher depression scores had lower study satisfaction scores. After adjusting for these factors, greater study staff change frequency was associated with lower study satisfaction in European parents (mothers at child-age 15 months: - 0.30,95% Cl - 0.36, - 0.24, p < 0.001; mothers at child-age four years: -0.41, 95% Cl - 0.53, - 0.29, p < 0.001; fathers at child-age 15 months: -0.28, 95% Cl - 0.34, - 0.21, p < 0.001; fathers at child-age four years: -0.35, 95% Cl - 0.48, - 0.21, p < 0.001). Staff consistency was not associated with parent study satisfaction in the US. However, the number of staff changes was markedly higher in the US compared to Europe.

conclusionsSociodemographic factors, parental characteristics, and study-related variables were all related to parent study satisfaction. Those that are potentially modifiable are of particular interest as possible targets of future efforts to improve parent study satisfaction. Three such factors were identified: parent accuracy about the child's type 1 diabetes risk, parent beliefs that something can be done to reduce the child's risk, and study staff consistency. However, staff consistency was important only for European parents.

trial registrationNCT00279318 .

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionProfessional-Family RelationsChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFinlandGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenUnited StatesChildGenetic riskLongitudinal studyParent satisfactionStaff consistencyStudy satisfactionType 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35012530
PMCPMC8744326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.