Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012529›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Implementation evaluation of a collective impact initiative to promote adolescent health in Oklahoma County, USA.

Whitney R Garney, Sonya Panjwani, Kelly Wilson, Kristen E Garcia, Sharayah Fore, Shelby C Lautner, Laura Lang, Brittney Criswell, Ronneal Mathews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Whitney R GarneyDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Sonya PanjwaniDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. sonya.panjwani@tamu.edu.
Kelly WilsonDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Kristen E GarciaDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Sharayah ForeThrive: Sexual Collective for Youth, 3000 United Founders Blvd #247, Oklahoma City, OK, 73112, USA.
Shelby C LautnerDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, 4243 TAMU, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Laura LangThrive: Sexual Collective for Youth, 3000 United Founders Blvd #247, Oklahoma City, OK, 73112, USA.
Brittney CriswellThrive: Sexual Collective for Youth, 3000 United Founders Blvd #247, Oklahoma City, OK, 73112, USA.
Ronneal MathewsThrive: Sexual Collective for Youth, 3000 United Founders Blvd #247, Oklahoma City, OK, 73112, USA.
Oklahoma City University · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe teenage birth rate in the USA has considerably decreased in recent decades; however, more innovative, collaborative approaches are needed to promote adolescent health and prevent teenage pregnancy at the community level. Despite literature on the promising results of the collective impact (CI) model for health promotion, there is limited literature on the model's ability to reduce teenage pregnancies in a community. The Central Oklahoma Teen Pregnancy Prevention Collaboration is applying the CI model to foster collaboration among multiple stakeholders with the goal of increasing community and organizational capacity to improve adolescent health outcomes. This paper reports the findings from the initiative's implementation evaluation, which sought to understand whether the CI model improved collaboration among organizations and understand barriers and facilitators that affected program delivery.

methodsProgram implementers and evaluators jointly developed research questions to guide the intervention and evaluation design. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to assess program components including the intervention characteristics, organization setting, community setting, facilitator characteristics, and the process of implementation. Primary sources of data included performance measures, meeting observations (n = 11), and semi-structured interviews (n = 10). The data was thematically analyzed using CFIR constructs, community capacity domains, and the five constructs of CI.

resultsKey findings include the need for shortened meeting times for meaningful engagement, opportunities for organizations to take on more active roles in the Collaboration, and enhanced community context expertise (i.e., those with lived experience) in all Collaboration initiatives. We identified additional elements to the core constructs of CI that are necessary for successful implementation: distinct role identification for partner organizations and incorporation of equity and inclusivity into collaboration processes and procedures.

conclusionsResults from this implementation evaluation provide valuable insights into implementation fidelity, participant experience, and implementation reach of an innovative, systems-level program. Findings demonstrate the context and requirements needed to successfully implement this innovative program approach and CI overall. Additional core elements for CI are identified and contribute to the growing body of literature on successful CI initiatives.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthPregnancy in AdolescenceAdolescentFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMotivationOklahomaPregnancyQualitative ResearchAdolescenceCollaborationCommunity capacity buildingProcess evaluationTeenage pregnancy prevention

Identifiers

PMID35012529
PMCPMC8743353
OpenAlexW4205388870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.