Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012513›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Development and evaluation of an electronic nursing documentation system.

Mohsen Shafiee, Mostafa Shanbehzadeh, Zeinab Nassari, Hadi Kazemi-Arpanahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Development of an app to support in-home care consultation visits].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohsen ShafieeDepartment of Nursing, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9511-585X
Mostafa ShanbehzadehDepartment of Health Information Technology, School of Paramedical, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3419-1947
Zeinab NassariDepartment of Nursing, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7392-6857
Hadi Kazemi-ArpanahiDepartment of Health Information Technology, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran. h.kazemi@abadanums.ac.ir.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8882-5765

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing documentation is a critical aspect of the nursing care workflow. There is a varying degree in how detailed nursing reports are described in scientific literature and care practice, and no uniform structured documentation is provided. This study aimed to describe the process of designing and evaluating the content of an electronic clinical nursing documentation system (ECNDS) to provide consistent and unified reporting in this context.

methodsA four-step sequential methodological approach was utilized. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) development process consisted of two phases, as follows: First, a literature review was performed to attain an exhaustive overview of the relevant elements of nursing and map the available evidence underpinning the development of the MDS. Then, the data included from the literature review were analyzed using a two-round Delphi study with content validation by an expert panel. Afterward, the ECNDS was developed according to the finalized MDS, and eventually, its performance was evaluated by involving the end-users.

resultsThe proposed MDS was divided into administrative and clinical sections; including nursing assessment and the nursing diagnosis process. Then, a web-based system with modular and layered architecture was developed based on the derived MDS. Finally, to evaluate the developed system, a survey of 150 registered nurses (RNs) was conducted to identify the positive and negative impacts of the system.

conclusionsThe developed system is suitable for the documentation of patient care in nursing care plans within a legal, ethical, and professional framework. However, nurses need further training in documenting patient care according to the nursing process, and in using the standard reporting templates to increase patient safety and improve documentation.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordElectronic medical recordsHospital information systemNursing processNursing records

Identifiers

PMID35012513
PMCPMC8744243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.