Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012477›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of real-world data in a Western cohort.

Verena Schlintl, Florian Huemer, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Thomas Melchardt, Thomas Winder, Patrick Reimann, Jakob Riedl, Arno Amann, Wolfgang Eisterer, Franz Romeder and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Verena Schlintl *Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Florian Huemer *Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Gabriel RinnerthalerDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas MelchardtDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Thomas WinderDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Patrick ReimannDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Feldkirch, Austria.
Jakob RiedlDivision of Clinical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Arno AmannDepartment of Internal Medicine V, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolfgang EistererDepartment of Internal Medicine and Oncology, Klagenfurt Hospital, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Franz RomederInternal Medicine I: Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Linz, Austria.
Gudrun PiringerDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, Wels-Grieskirchen Hospital, Wels, Austria and Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Aysegül Ilhan-MutluDepartment of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Gastroesophageal Tumor Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ewald WöllDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Vinzenz Hospital, Zams, Austria.
Richard GreilDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Lukas WeissDepartment of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria. lu.weiss@salk.at.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATLandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · ATComprehensive Cancer Center Vienna · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATKlinikum Klagenfurt · ATKlinikum Wels-Grieskirchen · ATMedical University of Graz · ATOrdensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer could be demonstrated in predominantly Asian cohorts, whereas data in Western patients outside of clinical trials are vastly missing.

methodsIn this multi-institutional retrospective analysis conducted at nine oncologic centers in Austria, we tried to assess feasibility of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric/GEJ cancer in a real-world Western cohort.

resultsIn total, data from 50 patients with metastatic gastric/GEJ cancer who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab in a palliative setting between November 2015 and April 2020 have been evaluated. The median number of previous palliative therapy lines was two. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 2.1 (95% CI: 1.4-2.8) and 6.3 (95% CI: 3.3-9.3) months, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in median OS according to microsatellite or PD-L1 status. However, a trend towards prolonged PFS and OS for the microsatellite instability high subgroup could be observed. Patients with an ECOG Performance Status (PS) ≥ 2 displayed a significantly worse outcome than those with an ECOG PS ≤ 1 (p = .03). Only one patient discontinued immunotherapy due to treatment-related toxicity.

conclusionsOur results support feasibility of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in pre-treated patients with metastatic gastric and GEJ cancer in a Western real-world cohort. Further phase II/III studies are needed to confirm clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAustriaEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabProgression-Free SurvivalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabpembrolizumabGastric cancerImmunotherapyNivolumabPembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID35012477
PMCPMC8744304
OpenAlexW4205608272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.