ArticleJournal of dental research2022
Scoping Review of Oral Health-Related Birth Cohort Studies: Toward a Global Consortium.
Article in Journal of dental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrochemical Biosensing Strategies for Oral Health: From Engineered Interfaces to Advanced Transistor Architectures.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Who Gets Dental Caries? A Comprehensive Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Caries experience among children and adolescents from a longitudinal Swedish national registry study over a 10-year period.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Oral Health Conditions of Preschool Children Among Birth Cohort Studies: A Scoping Review.Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2025Article
- Introduction of fruit juice and sugar-sweetened beverages before 6 months of age and early childhood caries at 3.5 years: the ELFE cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- An International Research Agenda for Oral Health Birth Cohort Studies.Journal of dental research · 2025Article
- Poverty Dynamics and Caries Status in Young Adolescents.Community dentistry and oral epidemiology · 2025Article
- A mapping review of worldwide current and previous cohort research programmes in cats and dogs.PloS one · 2025Review
- Measuring sugar intake in oral health birth cohort studies: a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Model to explain dental visit for children aged 0 to 5: Scoping review of birth cohorts.PloS one · 2025Article
- Caries and white spot lesion trajectories of orthodontic patients across an observation period of 20 years.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Early life factors and oral microbial signatures define the risk of caries in a Swedish cohort of preschool children.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Oral and craniofacial research in the Generation R study: an executive summary.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The multidisciplinary nature and long duration of birth cohort studies allow investigation of the relationship between general and oral health and indicate the most appropriate stages in life to intervene. To date, the worldwide distribution of oral health-related birth cohort studies (OHRBCSs) has not been mapped, and a synthesis of information on methodological characteristics and outcomes is not available. We mapped published literature on OHRBCSs, describing their oral health-related data and methodological aspects. A 3-step search strategy was adopted to identify published studies using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases. Studies with baseline data collection during pregnancy or within the first year of life or linked future oral health data to exposures during either of these 2 life stages were included. Studies examining only mothers' oral health and specific populations were excluded. In total, 1,721 articles were suitable for initial screening of titles and abstracts, and 528 articles were included in the review, identifying 120 unique OHRBCSs from 34 countries in all continents. The review comprised literature from the mid-1940s to the 21st century. Fifty-four percent of the OHRBCSs started from 2000 onward, and 75% of the cohorts were from high-income and only 2 from low-income countries. The participation rate between the baseline and the last oral health follow-up varied between 7% and 93%. Ten cohorts that included interventions were mostly from 2000 and with fewer than 1,000 participants. Seven data-linkage cohorts focused mostly on upstream characteristics and biological aspects. The most frequent clinical assessment was dental caries, widely presented as decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT/dmft). Periodontal conditions were primarily applied as isolated outcomes or as part of a classification system. Socioeconomic classification, ethnicity, and country- or language-specific assessment tools varied across countries. Harmonizing definitions will allow combining data from different studies, adding considerable strength to data analyses; this will be facilitated by forming a global consortium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.