Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012328›Full record

ReviewStroke2022

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale as an Outcome in Stroke Research: Value of ANCOVA Over Analyzing Change From Baseline.

Eva A Mistry, Sharon D Yeatts, Pooja Khatri, Akshitkumar M Mistry, Michelle Detry, Kert Viele, Frank E Harrell, Roger J Lewis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Early neurological improvement with deferoxamine after intracerebral hemorrhage: A post hoc analysis of the i-DEF trial.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eva A MistryDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH (E.A.M., P.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-7426-3650
Sharon D YeattsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (S.D.Y.).ORCID 0000-0001-9235-0670
Pooja KhatriDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH (E.A.M., P.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-7344-8266
Akshitkumar M MistryDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, KY (A.M.M.).ORCID 0000-0002-7918-5153
Michelle DetryBerry Consultants LLC, Austin, TX (M.D., K.V., R.J.L.).
Kert VieleBerry Consultants LLC, Austin, TX (M.D., K.V., R.J.L.).
Frank E HarrellDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN (F.E.H.).
Roger J LewisBerry Consultants LLC, Austin, TX (M.D., K.V., R.J.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-0020-4869

Funding

ACTIV Integration of Host-targeting Therapies for COVID-19 Administrative Coordinating CenterOT2HL156812 · NHLBI · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI NOLEN, TRACY L, THOMAS, SONIA M · 2020 to 2024
$1270.7M
Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) -Identifying correlates of functional immunity in SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasmaUL1TR002243 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Paul A. Harris, Wesley H Self · 2017 to 2026
$130.7M
Workshop to Identify Collaborative Project(s) for the NIH StrokeNet and the Japan NEtwork for Clinical Stroke Trials (NECST)U01NS087748 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Catherine R. Dillon, Jordan J. Elm · 2014 to 2026
$14.1M
Ohio Valley Regional Coordinating Center for NINDS Stroke Trial NetworkU24NS107241 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI Stacie Demel, Eva Mistry · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
Blood Pressure after Endovascular Stroke Therapy-II: A Randomized TrialK23NS113858 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MISTRY, EVA · 2019 to 2023
$901k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002243NHLBI NIH HHS OT2 HL156812NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS113858NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS087748NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS107241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), measured a few hours to days after stroke onset, is an attractive outcome measure for stroke research. NIHSS at the time of presentation (baseline NIHSS) strongly predicts the follow-up NIHSS. Because of the need to account for the baseline NIHSS in the analysis of follow-up NIHSS as an outcome measure, a common and intuitive approach is to define study outcome as the change in NIHSS from baseline to follow-up (ΔNIHSS). However, this approach has important limitations. Analyzing ΔNIHSS implies a very strong assumption about the relationship between baseline and follow-up NIHSS that is unlikely to be satisfied, drawing into question the validity of the resulting statistical analysis. This reduces the precision of the estimates of treatment effects and the power of clinical trials that use this approach to analysis. ANCOVA allows for the analysis of follow-up NIHSS as the dependent variable while adjusting for baseline NIHSS as a covariate in the model and addresses several challenges of using ΔNIHSS outcome using simple bivariate comparisons (eg, a

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Severity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Statesgoalischemic strokeNational Institutes of Health (US)patientsstatistics

Identifiers

PMID35012328
PMCPMC8960347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.