ArticleZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2022
[Preliminary discussion on the prevention and treatment of shock after severe burns].
Article in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role and Mechanism of Nanozymes in Burn Wound Healing.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- The Individual-Level and Community-Level Social Determinants of Burn Injuries: A Single-Institution Study From the Southwestern United States.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025Article
- Luminol-conjugated cyclodextrin biological nanoparticles for the treatment of severe burn-induced intestinal barrier disruption.Burns & trauma · 2024Article
- Research advances in prevention and treatment of burn wound deepening in early stage.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Shock is one of the most common complications and one of the main causes of death after severe burns. The prevention and treatment of shock runs through the whole process of severe burn treatment. Shocks after severe burns, based on their causes, are mainly classified as follows: hypovolemic shock characterized by elevated hematocrit, also known as burn shock, and caused by serious leakage of intravascular fluid to body surface and interstitial spaces in the early stage of burns; hemorrhagic shock caused by large scale of incision and tension reduction, gastrointestinal stress ulcer, or large area of escharectomy and tangential excision surgery; septic shock caused by various microbial invasion; anaphylactic shock caused by infusion of drugs or blood. From the perspective of the reduction of effective circulating volume, burn shock and hemorrhagic shock are hypovolemic shocks, and septic shock and anaphylactic shock are vasodilatory shocks. As the aforementioned shocks vary in terms of occurrence timing, occurrence mechanism, and clinical manifestations, individualized strategies should be adopted for the prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.