Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35012010›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2022

Newborn Hearing Screening Benefits Children, but Global Disparities Persist.

Katrin Neumann, Philipp Mathmann, Shelly Chadha, Harald A Euler, Karl R White

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Universal newborn hearing screening in Southwest Iran: coverage, risk factors, and outcomes in a large-scale population.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Choanal atresia repair in Europe and the world - a comprehensive investigation of the current state of care.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of a two-stage newborn hearing screening protocol for early diagnosis of hearing loss.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Congenital deafness: from screening to management.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. [Early detection program for hearing loss at Bajio's National Medical Center].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Katrin NeumannDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3975-0736
Philipp MathmannDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3743-2184
Shelly ChadhaBlindness Deafness Prevention, Disability and Rehabilitation Unit, Department for Management of Noncommunicable Diseases, Disability, Violence and Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Harald A EulerDepartment of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Karl R WhiteNational Center for Hearing Assessment and Management, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.
University Hospital Münster · DEUtah State University · USWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial evidence that newborn hearing screening (NHS) reduces the negative sequelae of permanent childhood hearing loss (PCHL) if performed in programs that aim to screen all newborns in a region or nation (often referred to as Universal Newborn Hearing Screening or UNHS). The World Health Organization (WHO) has called in two resolutions for the implementation of such programs and for the collection of large-scale data. To assess the global status of NHS programs we surveyed individuals potentially involved with newborn and infant hearing screening (NIHS) in 196 countries/territories (in the following text referred to as countries). Replies were returned from 158 countries. The results indicated that 38% of the world's newborns and infants had no or minimal hearing screening and 33% screened at least 85% of the babies (hereafter referred to as UNHS). Hearing screening programs varied considerably in quality, data acquisition, and accessibility of services for children with PCHL. In this article, we summarize the main results of the survey in the context of several recent WHO publications, particularly the World Report on Hearing, which defined advances in the implementation of NHS programs in the Member States as one of three key indicators of worldwide progress in ear and hearing care (EHC).

Indexed as

hearinghearing lossinfantneonatalnewbornNHSscreeninguniversalWHOworld report on hearing

Identifiers

PMID35012010
PMCPMC8746089
OpenAlexW4206422644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.