ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Association of Regular Endoscopic Screening with Interval Gastric Cancer Incidence in the National Cancer Screening Program.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Randomized controlled trial comparing the costs of gastric cancer screening systems between serological risk-based upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and the existing barium photofluorography: gastric cancer screening labeled by serum examination in place of aged gastric cancer organized screening systems (GALAPAGOS study).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024Trial
- PCSK9 inhibition attenuates alcohol-induced cardiovascular dysfunction and links hepatic lipid accumulation to impaired myocardial contractile reserve.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Sex-specific differences in clinical characteristics and organ damage in Hypertensive Urgencies.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Emerging omics diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Elevated Copper Level in Schizophrenia Results in Neurotransmitter and Cognitive Alteration.Biological trace element research · 2026Article
- 3D T1-Weighted Black-Blood MRI in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Facial Neuritis: a Single-Center Prospective Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Prediction model for postoperative acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease in patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumor thrombus.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of LncRNAs CBR3-AS1 and PCA3 expression in Gastric cancer and their correlation to clinicopathological variables.Genes & cancer · 2025Article
- Automatic detection and visualization of temporomandibular joint effusion with deep neural network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of endoscopic surveillance on the early diagnosis and endoscopic resection likelihood of gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Risk of upper gastrointestinal cancer and death in persons with negative screening results: results from the National Cancer Screening Program in South Korea.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2023Article
- Role of Endoscopy in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Application of a novel scoring system for gastric cancer opportunistic screening in hospital visits.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although regular endoscopic screening may help in early detection of gastric cancer, interval cancer remains a problem in the screening program. This study evaluated the association between regular endoscopic screening and interval cancer detection in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP). We defined three groups (regularly, irregularly, and not screened) according to the screening interval, and the trends in the interval cancer rate (ICR) between the groups were tested using the Cochran-Armitage test. The influence of regular endoscopic screening on the risk of interval cancer was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Among the 11,642,410 participants who underwent endoscopy, the overall ICR was 0.36 per 1000 negative screenings. The ICR of the not screened group (0.41) was the highest among the three groups and the risk of interval cancer in this group was 1.68 times higher (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.