Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011955›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique (FIT) Improves Tooth Surface Clean-Up after Debonding of Buccal and Lingual Orthodontic Appliances.

Olivia Engeler, Oliver Stadler, Simone Horn, Christian Dettwiler, Thomas Connert, Carlalberta Verna, Georgios Kanavakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impacts of clean-up visualization techniques on excess composite of orthodontic attachments.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Fluorescence-aided identification technique (FIT) in retainer removal : Effects on enamel loss, composite residue, and time.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Olivia EngelerDepartment of Pediatric Oral Health and Orthodontics, UZB-University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Oliver StadlerDepartment of Pediatric Oral Health and Orthodontics, UZB-University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Simone HornDepartment of Pediatric Oral Health and Orthodontics, UZB-University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Christian DettwilerDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, UZB-University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas ConnertDepartment of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, UZB-University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4461-5835
Carlalberta VernaDepartment of Pediatric Oral Health and Orthodontics, UZB-University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Georgios KanavakisDepartment of Pediatric Oral Health and Orthodontics, UZB-University Center for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7304-044X

Funding

Swiss Dental Association 292-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of fluorescence inducing light to aid the clean-up of tooth surfaces after bracket removal when using buccal or lingual orthodontic appliances. Two full sets of dental arches using extracted human teeth were assembled, with 14 teeth per arch. All teeth were bonded on their buccal and lingual surfaces. After debonding, a single blinded operator performed the tooth surface clean-up, as commonly performed in clinical practice; without the use of fluorescent light (non-FIT) and with two methods using fluorescent light to identify composite remnants on the tooth surfaces (FIT; OPAL and BRACE). Tooth surfaces were scanned before bonding and after clean-up, and the two scans were superimposed using the best-fit method. The results showed that the debonding method, type of tooth and type of tooth surface had a significant effect on the presence of composite remnants, enamel defects, and on debonding time. Contrary to the non-FIT method, there were no composite remnants after clean-up with the use of fluorescence inducing light. Clean-up time was significantly reduced on the buccal surfaces when using the FIT methods. On the lingual surfaces, the FIT methods resulted in larger enamel defects.

Indexed as

composite remnantsdebondingenamel defectsFITfluorescent lightorthodontics

Identifiers

PMID35011955
PMCPMC8746233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.