ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Expectant Management of PPROM Improves Neonatal Outcome-A Retrospective Study of 562 Patients.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tailored-prom: tailored therapeutic regime in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes to prolong pregnancy, improve maternal and neonatal outcomes, and reduce antibiotic burden: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Maintenance tocolysis in twin pregnancies after preterm premature rupture of membranes and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Phenotypes of Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study from a Tertiary Romanian Centre as a Framework for Future Genomic and Proteomic Research.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive model for preterm premature rupture of membranes following fetal endoscopy laser coagulation in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome surgery.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Article
- Assessment of Cervical IL-6 Levels and Neonatal Inflammatory Response in Preterm Birth Following Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- Neonatal Renal Ultrasound Reference Values in Romanian Term Newborns: Correlations with Anthropometric Characteristics.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neurological Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants: An Updated Review of Recent Research and Clinical Insights.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Adherence to Palivizumab for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis in Romanian Infants.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Preterm Prelabour Rupture of Membrane (PPROM) in a Young Female in South-South Nigeria: A Clinical Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prelabor preterm rupture of the membranes (PPROM) refers to the rupture of the membranes before 37 weeks, but also before the onset of labor. Approximately 3% of pregnancies are complicated by PPROM, which is an important cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the benefit of expectant management in PPROM, compared to immediate birth, defined in our study as birth in the first 48 h. We analyzed 562 pregnancies with PPROM by gestational age groups and short-term morbidities. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational analytical study, which included women with PPROM between 24 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks. We divided the cohort into gestational age groups: group 1 gestational age (GA) between 24 and 27, group 2 GA between 28 and 31, group 3 GA between 32 and 34, group 4 GA > 35 weeks. In each group, we analyzed the benefit of the latency period (established in our study as delivery after 48 h of hospitalization) in terms of short-term neonatal complications.
resultThe latency period brought a significant benefit starting with GA greater than 28 weeks; therefore, in the group with GA between 28-31, the complications were significantly statistically lower, mentioning respiratory distress syndrome (no latency 100% vs. latency 85.1%) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (no latency 89.7% vs. latency 70.2%). In group 3, with GA between 32-34, we reached statistical significance in terms of respiratory distress syndrome (no latency 61.8% vs. latency 39%), hypoxia (no latency 50% vs. latency 31.7%) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (no latency 70.2% vs. latency 47.4%).
conclusionExpectant management of pregnancies with PPROM can bring a real benefit in terms of the incidence of complications in premature infants, but this benefit depends most on the gestational age at which the membranes ruptured and the medical conduct put into practice during the latency period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.