Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011954›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Expectant Management of PPROM Improves Neonatal Outcome-A Retrospective Study of 562 Patients.

Roxana Elena Bohilțea, Ana Maria Cioca, Vlad Dima, Ioniță Ducu, Corina Grigoriu, Valentin Varlas, Florentina Furtunescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roxana Elena BohilțeaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 11-13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6381-7419
Ana Maria CiocaFaculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9345-8384
Vlad DimaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 11-13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania.
Ioniță DucuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Emergency Hospital, 169 Splaiul Independentei Bld., Sector 5, 050098 Bucharest, Romania.
Corina GrigoriuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Valentin VarlasDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 11-13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8342-9819
Florentina FurtunescuDepartment of Public Health and Management, Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prelabor preterm rupture of the membranes (PPROM) refers to the rupture of the membranes before 37 weeks, but also before the onset of labor. Approximately 3% of pregnancies are complicated by PPROM, which is an important cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the benefit of expectant management in PPROM, compared to immediate birth, defined in our study as birth in the first 48 h. We analyzed 562 pregnancies with PPROM by gestational age groups and short-term morbidities. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational analytical study, which included women with PPROM between 24 + 0 and 36 + 6 weeks. We divided the cohort into gestational age groups: group 1 gestational age (GA) between 24 and 27, group 2 GA between 28 and 31, group 3 GA between 32 and 34, group 4 GA > 35 weeks. In each group, we analyzed the benefit of the latency period (established in our study as delivery after 48 h of hospitalization) in terms of short-term neonatal complications.

resultThe latency period brought a significant benefit starting with GA greater than 28 weeks; therefore, in the group with GA between 28-31, the complications were significantly statistically lower, mentioning respiratory distress syndrome (no latency 100% vs. latency 85.1%) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (no latency 89.7% vs. latency 70.2%). In group 3, with GA between 32-34, we reached statistical significance in terms of respiratory distress syndrome (no latency 61.8% vs. latency 39%), hypoxia (no latency 50% vs. latency 31.7%) and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (no latency 70.2% vs. latency 47.4%).

conclusionExpectant management of pregnancies with PPROM can bring a real benefit in terms of the incidence of complications in premature infants, but this benefit depends most on the gestational age at which the membranes ruptured and the medical conduct put into practice during the latency period.

Indexed as

corticosteroidexpectant managementlatencyneonatal outcomePPROMpremature complicationsprematuritypreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID35011954
PMCPMC8745911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.