ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Evolution of Salvage Radical Prostatectomy from Open to Robotic and Further to Retzius Sparing Surgery.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Can salvage Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy improve continence outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis study.World journal of urology · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes of Salvage Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the last decade: systematic review and perspectives of referral centers.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyPooled it
- Early Postoperative Outcomes with the ToumaiCancers · 2026Article
- Robot-Assisted Salvage Prostatectomy: External Validation of the EAU Selection Criteria and Identification of the Optimal Candidate: A Junior ERUS/YAU Collaborative Study.The Prostate · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of surgery for radio-recurrent prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- DATA 5.0-Data Acquisition, Translation & Analysis-a prospective urooncological data warehouse for the 21st century.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy by Lateral Approach: Technique, Reproducibility and Outcomes.Cancers · 2023Article
- Preliminary comparison of the modified extraperitoneal free-PORT single incision technique and transabdominal multi-incision robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Retzius-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy: Technical Challenges for Surgeons and Key Prospective Refinements.Research and reports in urology · 2023Review
- Salvage Retzius-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy: A Review of Complications, Functional Outcomes, and Oncologic Outcomes.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salvage radical prostatectomy (sRP) has evolved from open to minimally invasive approaches. sRP can be offered to patients with local recurrence to improve biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free and overall survival. We evaluate oncological outcome and continence after retropubic (RRP), conventional (cRARP), and Retzius-sparing robotic (rsRARP) surgery. MATERIALS/
methodsA total of 53 patients undergoing sRP between 2010 and 2020 were included. Follow-up included oncological outcome and continence.
resultssRP was done as RRP (
conclusionsOver the years, sRP has shifted from open to laparoscopic/robotic surgery. RARP shows good oncological and functional outcome. rsRARP ensures direct vision on the rectum during preparation and can therefore increase safety and surgeon's confidence, especially in the salvage setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.