Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011923›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Weakening or Structural Strengthening? An Evaluation of Bone Density after MRgFUS Ablation for Treatment of Benign Bone Lesions.

Camilla de Cataldo, Federico Bruno, Stefano Necozione, Mariangela Novello, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Luigi Zugaro, Antonio Barile, Carlo Masciocchi, Francesco Arrigoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Camilla de CataldoDepartment of Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Federico BrunoDepartment of Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Stefano NecozioneEpidemiology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Science, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Mariangela NovelloDepartment of Pathology, IRCSS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-0092
Luigi ZugaroDepartment of Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Antonio BarileDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Carlo MasciocchiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.
Francesco ArrigoniDepartment of Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-1872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that interventional ablative procedures on bone lesions may weaken the bone, especially when performed through the needle approach. Our purpose was to evaluate, through Computed Tomography (CT), the effects of Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) ablation on painful osteoid osteomas and osteoblastomas in terms of bone density and morphological changes. We retrospectively evaluated patients treated at our institution with MRgFUS for superficial, painful osteoid osteoma or osteoblastoma during the last 9 years. Inclusion criteria were procedural and clinical success, as well as the availability of pre- and postprocedural CT examinations. Imaging features assessed were perilesional/nidus density changes and the occurrence of pathological fractures during the follow-up period. Our study population included 31 osteoid osteomas and 5 intra-articular osteoblastomas in 36 treated patients. We found an increased bone density of the lesions when pre and post-treatment CT- values were compared: these differences were statistically significant, and this finding is consistent with significant bone densification at the post-treatment imaging follow-up. No pathological fractures were observed after ablation during the follow-up. MRgFUS can be considered to be the treatment of choice for benign superficial bone lesions, thanks to its minimal invasiveness, excellent effectiveness, and safety. Pathological fractures, reported in literature as a rare event using needle ablation, never occurred in our MRgFUS treatment series.

Indexed as

ablationbone densityMRgFUSmusculoskeletal interventional radiologyosteoblastomaosteoid osteoma

Identifiers

PMID35011923
PMCPMC8745457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.