ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021
Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis of the S-O Clip's Impact on Procedural Outcomes and Lesion-Specific Applications.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Bridge technique self-traction improves outcomes over conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for semicircumferential gastric cardia neoplasms in a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of different traction numbers in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Cholangioscope combined with biliary forceps: a novel double-endoscope traction method for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy · 2026Article
- Cholangioscope combined with biliary forceps: a novel double-endoscope traction method for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Planned use of a novel Elastic Traction Device improves efficiency in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a propensity-score matched study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Usefulness of the Bridge Formation Method for Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparison of traction vs. snare as rescue methods for challenging colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Propensity score-matched study.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Development of a novel multipoint traction device for gastric and colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and evaluation of its efficacy and safety.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- ESD with elastic ring traction is more effective and safer than conventional ESD in large proximal colon neoplastic lesions: a retrospective cohort study (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of water pressure method in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by novice endoscopists.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
- Safe and Efficient Procedures and Training System for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Special Issue: "10th Anniversary of JCM-Recent Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine".Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the utility of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective study on 185 patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2015 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of the S-O clip. Forty-two patients underwent conventional ESD (CO group) and 29 patients underwent ESD using the S-O clip (SO group). We compared the surgery duration, dissection speed, en bloc resection rate, and complication rate between both groups. Compared with the CO group, the SO group had a significantly shorter surgery duration (70.7 ± 37.9 min vs. 51.2 ± 18.6 min;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.