Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011786›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Conventional Trabeculotomy versus Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Masashi Takata, Hiroto Ishikawa, Tomohiro Ikeda, Fumi Gomi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Visual Function After Schlemm's Canal-Based MIGS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masashi TakataDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya 6638501, Japan.
Hiroto IshikawaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya 6638501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0760-7203
Tomohiro IkedaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya 6638501, Japan.
Fumi GomiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya 6638501, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0807-8817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional trabeculotomy (CT) is performed in an ab-externo manner with at most 120 degrees of incision area of Schlemm's canal (SC). Recently, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT), which makes possible a 360-degree incision area of SC in an ab-interno manner, is introduced. The purpose of this study was to compare surgical outcomes for CT and GATT with and without simultaneous phacoemulsification over 24 months and to identify factors associated with surgical success.

resultsPatients' baseline characteristics were not significantly different between two groups. The surgical success rate in CT and GATT with phacoemulsification groups were 40.4% and 96.6% and were significantly higher in the GATT group than in the CT group (

conclusionAlthough both groups without phacoemulsification had a similar surgical success and IOP-lowering effect, GATT combined with phacoemulsification had a higher surgical success rate and a greater IOP-lowering effect compared with combined CT and phacoemulsification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the factors associated with higher surgical success at one year and two years postoperatively were the combined phacoemulsification procedure and the GATT.

Indexed as

conventional trabeculotomyglaucomagonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomySchlemm’s canal

Identifiers

PMID35011786
PMCPMC8745353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.