Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011780›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Improvement of Insight with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.

Martin Blay, Ondine Adam, Rémy Bation, Filipe Galvao, Jérôme Brunelin, Marine Mondino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martin BlayCentre Hospitalier le Vinatier, F-69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-1768
Ondine AdamCentre Hospitalier le Vinatier, F-69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6311-2796
Rémy BationUniversité Lyon 1, Lyon University, F-69100 Villeurbanne, France.
Filipe GalvaoCentre Hospitalier le Vinatier, F-69500 Bron, France.
Jérôme BrunelinCentre Hospitalier le Vinatier, F-69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-5628
Marine MondinoCentre Hospitalier le Vinatier, F-69500 Bron, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3175-8503

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with schizophrenia are often unaware of their condition and the consequences of their illness. This lack of insight results in impaired functioning, treatment non-adherence and poor prognosis. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on two forms of insight, clinical and cognitive, in patients with schizophrenia. We conducted a systematic review of the literature registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42020220323) according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in Medline and Web of Science databases based on studies published up until October 2020 that included pre-NIBS and post-NIBS measurements of clinical and/or cognitive insight in adults with schizophrenia. A total of 14 studies were finally included, and their methodological quality was assessed by using the QualSyst tool. Despite the lack of well-conducted large randomized-controlled studies using insight as the primary outcome, the available findings provide preliminary evidence that NIBS can improve clinical insight in patients with schizophrenia, with a majority of studies using transcranial direct current stimulation with a left frontotemporal montage. Further studies should investigate the effect of NIBS on insight as a primary outcome and how these effects on insight could translate into clinical and functional benefits in patients with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

electroconvulsive therapyillness awarenessneuromodulationtranscranial alternating current stimulationtranscranial direct current stimulationtranscranial electrical stimulationtranscranial magnetic stimulationtranscranial random-noise stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35011780
PMCPMC8745271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.