Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011779›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Treatment outside the Recommended Guidelines for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP): Prevalence, Characteristics, and Issues.

Daniel Lemaître, Amandine Barjol, Youssef Abdelmassih, Caroline Farnoux, Gilles C Martin, Florence Metge, Thibaut Chapron, Georges Caputo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. External validation of an artificial intelligence-based model for retinopathy of prematurity screening using Phoenix ICON retinal images.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel LemaîtrePediatric Ophthalmology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.
Amandine BarjolPediatric Ophthalmology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.
Youssef AbdelmassihPediatric Ophthalmology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9887-0992
Caroline FarnouxDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Robert Debre, 75019 Paris, France.
Gilles C MartinPediatric Ophthalmology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.
Florence MetgePediatric Ophthalmology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.
Thibaut ChapronPediatric Ophthalmology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.
Georges CaputoPediatric Ophthalmology Department, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess the prevalence and characteristics of preterm infants with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treated outside the recommended guidelines. In this retrospective monocentric cohort, we included all premature children treated in our department for ROP by laser photoablation or anti-VEGF intravitreal injection. The main outcome was treatment of both eyes for ROP less severe than pre-threshold type 1, treated outside ETROP guidelines. A total of 114 children received treatment for ROP in our department, among whom 32 (28.1%) children received treatment for indications outside the ETROP guidelines for both eyes. The indications outside the guidelines were persistent stage 2 or 3 ROP that showed no evidence of regression after 41 weeks of corrected gestational age (11 children; 34.4%), pre-plus stage (11; 34.4%), difficulties in disease staging (7; 21.9%), type 2 ROP with plus disease (2; 6.2%), and treatment due to logistical difficulties (1; 3.1%; hospitalized in neonatal units hundreds of miles away from our department, with no fundus examination possible in the neonatal unit). To resume, in our cohort, 28.1% of children received treatment for ROP less severe than pre-threshold type 1 both eyes. The main indications for off-label treatment were the persistence of active ROP during follow-up and the presence of pre-plus-stage disease. Our data suggest the need to update ROP treatment criteria to reflect real-life practices. Additional studies are required in order to evaluate the long-term benefits and side effects of treatments outside the recommended indications, and to establish revised treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

bevacizumab IVIETROPguidelineslaser photoablationretinopathy of prematurity

Identifiers

PMID35011779
PMCPMC8745039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.