Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011718›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Bone Marrow in an Early Stage of Ionizing Radiation Damage Are Able to Induce Bystander Responses in the Bone Marrow.

Dávid Kis, Ilona Barbara Csordás, Eszter Persa, Bálint Jezsó, Rita Hargitai, Tünde Szatmári, Nikolett Sándor, Enikő Kis, Katalin Balázs, Géza Sáfrány and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Irradiation alters extracellular vesicle microRNA load in the serum of patients with leukaemia.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Extracellular vesicles role in radio(nuclide)therapy.Journal of radiation research · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dávid KisNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Ilona Barbara CsordásNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter PersaNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint JezsóDoctoral School of Biology and Institute of Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1053 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-1306-4797
Rita HargitaiNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Tünde SzatmáriNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-9589
Nikolett SándorNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Enikő KisNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Katalin BalázsNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.
Géza SáfrányNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-9641-8732
Katalin LumniczkyNational Public Health Center, Department of Radiobiology and Radiohygiene, Unit of Radiation Medicine, 1097 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-1854
Semmelweis University · HUEötvös Loránd University · HU

Funding

Euratom Research and Training Programme 2014-2018 662287Hungarian National Research Development and Innovation Office NKFI-124879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionizing radiation (IR)-induced bystander effects contribute to biological responses to radiation, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) play important roles in mediating these effects. In this study we investigated the role of bone marrow (BM)-derived EVs in the bystander transfer of radiation damage. Mice were irradiated with 0.1Gy, 0.25Gy and 2Gy, EVs were extracted from the BM supernatant 24 h or 3 months after irradiation and injected into bystander mice. Acute effects on directly irradiated or EV-treated mice were investigated after 4 and 24 h, while late effects were investigated 3 months after treatment. The acute effects of EVs on the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell pools were similar to direct irradiation effects and persisted for up to 3 months, with the hematopoietic stem cells showing the strongest bystander responses. EVs isolated 3 months after irradiation elicited no bystander responses. The level of seven microRNAs (miR-33a-3p, miR-140-3p, miR-152-3p, miR-199a-5p, miR-200c-5p, miR-375-3p and miR-669o-5p) was altered in the EVs isolated 24 hour but not 3 months after irradiation. They regulated pathways highly relevant for the cellular response to IR, indicating their role in EV-mediated bystander responses. In conclusion, we showed that only EVs from an early stage of radiation damage could transmit IR-induced bystander effects.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAnimalsApoptosisBone MarrowBystander EffectDisease Models, AnimalHumansMaleMiceNeoplasm Stagingbone marrowbystander effectsextracellular vesiclesionizing radiationmiRNAstem cells

Identifiers

PMID35011718
PMCPMC8750882
OpenAlexW4205811923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.