Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011678›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Cell-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Glioblastoma: An Update from Preclinical to Clinical Studies.

Noha Attia, Mohamed Mashal, Sudhakar Pemminati, Adekunle Omole, Carolyn Edmondson, Will Jones, Priyanka Priyadarshini, Temoria Mughal, Pauline Aziz, Blesing Zenick and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CRISPR-Based Gene Therapy for Brain Disease.Molecular neurobiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Glioma Stem Cells: Novel Data Obtained by Single-Cell Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Natural Compounds as Promising Adjuvant Agents in The Treatment of Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Advanced Cell Therapies for Glioblastoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Noha AttiaThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.ORCID 0000-0002-2618-3891
Mohamed MashalThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.ORCID 0000-0001-5373-7178
Sudhakar PemminatiThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.
Adekunle OmoleThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.ORCID 0000-0003-0592-9735
Carolyn EdmondsonThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.
Will JonesThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.ORCID 0000-0002-0259-5664
Priyanka PriyadarshiniThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.
Temoria MughalThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.
Pauline AzizThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.
Blesing ZenickThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.
Ambar PerezThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.
Morgan LackenThe American University of Antigua-College of Medicine, Coolidge 1451, Antigua and Barbuda.

Funding

American University of Antigua CRE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GB), an aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system, represents about 60% of all adult primary brain tumors. It is notorious for its extremely low (~5%) 5-year survival rate which signals the unsatisfactory results of the standard protocol for GB therapy. This issue has become, over time, the impetus for the discipline of bringing novel therapeutics to the surface and challenging them so they can be improved. The cell-based approach in treating GB found its way to clinical trials thanks to a marvelous number of preclinical studies that probed various types of cells aiming to combat GB and increase the survival rate. In this review, we aimed to summarize and discuss the up-to-date preclinical studies that utilized stem cells or immune cells to treat GB. Likewise, we tried to summarize the most recent clinical trials using both cell categories to treat or prevent recurrence of GB in patients. As with any other therapeutics, cell-based therapy in GB is still hampered by many drawbacks. Therefore, we highlighted several novel techniques, such as the use of biomaterials, scaffolds, nanoparticles, or cells in the 3D context that may depict a promising future when combined with the cell-based approach.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyGlioblastomaHumansMiceSurvival AnalysiscancerCAR-T cellcell therapygliomaimmune cell therapystem cell

Identifiers

PMID35011678
PMCPMC8750228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.