Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011631›Full record

ArticleCells2021

Transcriptomic and Functional Evidence Show Similarities between Human Amniotic Epithelial Stem Cells and Keratinocytes.

Li-Ping Liu, Dong-Xu Zheng, Zheng-Fang Xu, Hu-Cheng Zhou, Yun-Cong Wang, Hang Zhou, Jian-Yun Ge, Daisuke Sako, Mi Li, Kazunori Akimoto and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Li-Ping LiuInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4445-8403
Dong-Xu ZhengFaculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1068-8403
Zheng-Fang XuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.
Hu-Cheng ZhouInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.
Yun-Cong WangInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1299-0403
Hang ZhouInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.
Jian-Yun GeFaculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan.
Daisuke SakoFaculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan.
Mi LiInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.
Kazunori AkimotoDepartment of Medicinal and Life Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokyo University of Science, Noda 278-8510, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0618-1765
Yu-Mei LiInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.
Yun-Wen ZhengInstitute of Regenerative Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9002-3190
Jiangsu University · CNUniversity of Tsukuba · JPTokyo University of Science · JP

Funding

apan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKENHI JP18H02866Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), KAKENHI JP16K15604National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770621National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070638National Natural Science Foundation of China 82103766Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20180281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amniotic epithelial stem cells (AESCs) are considered as potential alternatives to keratinocytes (KCs) in tissue-engineered skin substitutes used for treating skin damage. However, their clinical application is limited since similarities and distinctions between AESCs and KCs remain unclear. Herein, a transcriptomics analysis and functional evaluation were used to understand the commonalities and differences between AESCs and KCs. RNA-sequencing revealed that AESCs are involved in multiple epidermis-associated biological processes shared by KCs and show more similarity to early stage immature KCs than to adult KCs. However, AESCs were observed to be heterogeneous, and some possessed hybrid mesenchymal and epithelial features distinct from KCs. A functional evaluation revealed that AESCs can phagocytose melanosomes transported by melanocytes in both 2D and 3D co-culture systems similar to KCs, which may help reconstitute pigmented skin. The overexpression of TP63 and activation of NOTCH signaling could promote AESC stemness and improve their differentiation features, respectively, bridging the gap between AESCs and KCs. These changes induced the convergence of AESC cell fate with KCs. In future, modified reprogramming strategies, such as the use of small molecules, may facilitate the further modulation human AESCs for use in skin regeneration.

Indexed as

AmnionAnimalsCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell LineageEpitheliumHumansKeratinocytesMaleMelanocytesMelanosomesMesodermMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, NudePhagocytosisReceptors, NotchTP63 protein, humanTranscription FactorsTumor Suppressor Proteinsamniotic epithelial stem cellscell fatekeratinocytesmesenchymalreprogrammingskin regenerationskin substitutesstemnessTP63transcriptomics

Identifiers

PMID35011631
PMCPMC8750621
OpenAlexW4200176410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.