Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011605›Full record

ReviewCells2021

Extracellular Vesicles in Musculoskeletal Regeneration: Modulating the Therapy of the Future.

Hugo Abreu, Elena Canciani, Davide Raineri, Giuseppe Cappellano, Lia Rimondini, Annalisa Chiocchetti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. 80 years of extracellular vesicles: from discovery to clinical translation.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Human T-Cell Responses to Metallic Ion-Doped Bioactive Glasses.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hugo AbreuDepartment of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases-IRCAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4720-6519
Elena CancianiDepartment of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases-IRCAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6987-6794
Davide RaineriDepartment of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases-IRCAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3327-6305
Giuseppe CappellanoDepartment of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases-IRCAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5193-4688
Lia RimondiniDepartment of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases-IRCAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7785-2282
Annalisa ChiocchettiDepartment of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary Research Center of Autoimmune Diseases-IRCAD, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4349-1087
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

European Union 860462European Union 952033European Union 953121Fondazione Cariplo 2019-3277Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla 2020/PR-Single/021Ministry of Education, Universities and Research Departments of Excellence 2018-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue regeneration is a hot topic in health sciences, particularly because effective therapies promoting the healing of several cell types are lacking, specifically those of the musculoskeletal system. Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells (MSCs) have been identified as crucial players in bone homeostasis, and are considered a promising therapy for diseases such as osteoarthritis (OA) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). However, some known drawbacks limit their use, particularly ethical issues and immunological rejections. Thus, MSCs byproducts, namely Extracellular Vesicles (EVs), are emerging as potential solutions to overcome some of the issues of the original cells. EVs can be modulated by either cellular preconditioning or vesicle engineering, and thus represent a plastic tool to be implemented in regenerative medicine. Further, the use of biomaterials is important to improve EV delivery and indirectly to modulate their content and secretion. This review aims to connect the dots among MSCs, EVs, and biomaterials, in the context of musculoskeletal diseases.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsExtracellular VesiclesHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsMusculoskeletal DiseasesMusculoskeletal SystemRegenerationBiocompatible Materialsbiomaterialsextracellular vesiclesmesenchymal stem/stromal cellsregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID35011605
PMCPMC8750529
OpenAlexW4200004671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.