ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Parameter Reliability and Understanding Enzyme Function.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Composition and activity of the proteasome in human iPSC-derived neuronal model of early-stage sporadic Alzheimer's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- New Derivatives of 4-Piperidinylphenyl-Linked Thiazoles as VEGFR2 Inhibitors with Potential Cytotoxicity Against Renal Cancer.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Phytochemical analysis and enzyme inhibition of Origanum dictamnus L essential oil through in vitro and in silico methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Electrostatic ethanol fermentation: Experimental study and kinetic-based metabolic modeling.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Genome Mining and Genetic Manipulation Reveal New Isofuranonaphthoquinones inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A mathematical model for the role of dopamine-D2 self-regulation in the production of ultradian rhythms.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Turnover number predictions for kinetically uncharacterized enzymes using machine and deep learning.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Towards an active droplet-based microfluidic platform for programmable fluid handling.Lab on a chip · 2023Article
- Recombinant production, purification, and biochemical characterization of a novel L-lactate dehydrogenase fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Knowledge of the Michaelis-Menten parameters and their meaning in different circumstances is an essential prerequisite to understanding enzyme function and behaviour. The published literature contains an abundance of values reported for many enzymes. The problem concerns assessing the appropriateness and validity of such material for the purpose to which it is to be applied. This review considers the evaluation of such data with particular emphasis on the assessment of its fitness for purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.