Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011100›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

Can Feeding a Millet-Based Diet Improve the Growth of Children?-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Seetha Anitha, David Ian Givens, Kowsalya Subramaniam, Shweta Upadhyay, Joanna Kane-Potaka, Yakima D Vogtschmidt, Rosemary Botha, Takuji W Tsusaka, Swamikannu Nedumaran, Hemalatha Rajkumar and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Millets as superfoods: Let thy cereal be thy medicine.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Seetha AnithaSmart Food Initiative, International Crops Research Center for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7393-5489
David Ian GivensInstitute for Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6EU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6754-6935
Kowsalya SubramaniamFood Science and Nutrition, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore 641043, India.
Shweta UpadhyayUnited Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), Lilongwe 30375, Malawi.
Joanna Kane-PotakaSmart Food Initiative, International Crops Research Center for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India.
Yakima D VogtschmidtInstitute for Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6EU, UK.
Rosemary BothaDevelopment Strategy and Governance Division, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Lilongwe P.O. Box 31666, Malawi.
Takuji W TsusakaOstrom Center for Advanced Studies on Natural Resources Governance, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani 12120, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9872-2436
Swamikannu NedumaranEnabling Systems Transformation (EST), International Crops Research Center for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4755-1769
Hemalatha RajkumarNational Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad 500007, India.
Ananthan RajendranNational Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad 500007, India.
Devraj J ParasannanavarNational Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Hyderabad 500007, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7057-5702
Mani VetriventhanGene Bank, International Crops Research Center for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9111-2320
Raj Kumar BhandariNational Technical Board of Nutrition, Government of India (GoI), New Delhi 110001, India.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INNational Institute of Nutrition · INUniversity of Reading · GBAfrican Institute for Development Policy · MWAsian Institute of Technology · THAvinashilingam University · INGovernment of India · IN

Funding

SMART FOOD ENDOWEMENT FUND NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undernutrition, such as stunting and underweight, is a major public health concern, which requires multi-sectoral attention. Diet plays a key role in growth and should optimally supply all required nutrients to support the growth. While millets (defined broadly to include sorghum) are traditional foods, and climate smart nutritious crops, which are grown across Africa and Asia, they have not been mainstreamed like rice, wheat, and maize. Diversifying staples with millets can potentially provide more macro and micro nutrients, compared to the mainstream crops. However, there is little known scientific evidence to prove millets' efficacy on growth. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to collate evidence of the benefits of millets in improving the growth of children. Eight eligible randomized feeding trials were included in the meta-analysis. Results from the randomized effect model showed a significant effect (

Indexed as

Edible GrainMilletsSorghumDietHumansMalnutritionNutritional StatusOryzaadolescent growthheightinfant growthmilletsweight

Identifiers

PMID35011100
PMCPMC8747143
OpenAlexW4206510131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.