Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35011096›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

A Cross-Sectional Reproducibility Study of a Standard Camera Sensor Using Artificial Intelligence to Assess Food Items: The FoodIntech Project.

Virginie Van Wymelbeke-Delannoy, Charles Juhel, Hugo Bole, Amadou-Khalilou Sow, Charline Guyot, Farah Belbaghdadi, Olivier Brousse, Michel Paindavoine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Virginie Van Wymelbeke-DelannoyElderly Unit, University Hospital Center Dijon Bourgogne F Mitterrand, F-21000 Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4245-0267
Charles JuhelATOL Conseils & Développements (AtolCD), ZAE les Terres d'Or, Route de Saint Philibert, F-21220 Gevrey-Chambertin, France.
Hugo BoleATOL Conseils & Développements (AtolCD), ZAE les Terres d'Or, Route de Saint Philibert, F-21220 Gevrey-Chambertin, France.
Amadou-Khalilou SowCHU Dijon Bourgogne, Inserm, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Épidémiologie Clinique, F-21000 Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8073-9128
Charline GuyotElderly Unit, University Hospital Center Dijon Bourgogne F Mitterrand, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Farah BelbaghdadiElderly Unit, University Hospital Center Dijon Bourgogne F Mitterrand, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Olivier BrousseYumain, 14 Rue Pierre de Coubertin, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Michel PaindavoineYumain, 14 Rue Pierre de Coubertin, F-21000 Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6026-9453
Centre d'Investigation Clinique Pierre Drouin · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

FEDER 2016-6200FEO003S04417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Having a system to measure food consumption is important to establish whether individual nutritional needs are being met in order to act quickly and to minimize the risk of undernutrition. Here, we tested a smartphone-based food consumption assessment system named FoodIntech. FoodIntech, which is based on AI using deep neural networks (DNN), automatically recognizes food items and dishes and calculates food leftovers using an image-based approach, i.e., it does not require human intervention to assess food consumption. This method uses one-input and one-output images by means of the detection and synchronization of a QRcode located on the meal tray. The DNN are then used to process the images and implement food detection, segmentation and recognition. Overall, 22,544 situations analyzed from 149 dishes were used to test the reliability of this method. The reliability of the AI results, based on the central intra-class correlation coefficient values, appeared to be excellent for 39% of the dishes (

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNutrition AssessmentSmartphoneCross-Sectional StudiesFood AnalysisHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerReproducibility of Resultsartificial intelligencemachine learningmobile phone imagesportion evaluationreliability

Identifiers

PMID35011096
PMCPMC8747564
OpenAlexW4206171855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.